Background: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended.Methods: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS.Results: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk in-dividuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification.Conclusions: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.

Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial / Paraskevas, Kosmas I; Spence, J David; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P; Antignani, Pier Luigi; Gloviczki, Peter; Eckstein, Hans-Henning; Spinelli, Francesco; Stilo, Francesco; Saba, Luca; Poredos, Pavel; Dardik, Alan; Liapis, Christos D; Mansilha, Armando; Faggioli, Gianluca; Pini, Rodolfo; Jezovnik, Mateja K; Sultan, Sherif; Musiałek, Piotr; Goudot, Guillaume; Lavenson, George S; Jawien, Arkadiusz; Blinc, Aleš; Myrcha, Piotr; Fernandes E Fernandes, Jose; Geroulakos, George; Kakkos, Stavros K; Knoflach, Michael; Proczka, Robert M; Capoccia, Laura; Rundek, Tatjana; Svetlikov, Alexei S; Silvestrini, Mauro; Ricco, Jean-Baptiste; Davies, Alun H; Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo; Suri, Jasjit S; Lanza, Gaetano; Fraedrich, Gustav; Zeebregts, Clark J; Nicolaides, Andrew N. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1874-1754. - STAMPA. - 371:(2023), pp. 406-412. [10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.045]

Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial

Faggioli, Gianluca;
2023

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended.Methods: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS.Results: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk in-dividuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification.Conclusions: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.
2023
Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial / Paraskevas, Kosmas I; Spence, J David; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P; Antignani, Pier Luigi; Gloviczki, Peter; Eckstein, Hans-Henning; Spinelli, Francesco; Stilo, Francesco; Saba, Luca; Poredos, Pavel; Dardik, Alan; Liapis, Christos D; Mansilha, Armando; Faggioli, Gianluca; Pini, Rodolfo; Jezovnik, Mateja K; Sultan, Sherif; Musiałek, Piotr; Goudot, Guillaume; Lavenson, George S; Jawien, Arkadiusz; Blinc, Aleš; Myrcha, Piotr; Fernandes E Fernandes, Jose; Geroulakos, George; Kakkos, Stavros K; Knoflach, Michael; Proczka, Robert M; Capoccia, Laura; Rundek, Tatjana; Svetlikov, Alexei S; Silvestrini, Mauro; Ricco, Jean-Baptiste; Davies, Alun H; Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo; Suri, Jasjit S; Lanza, Gaetano; Fraedrich, Gustav; Zeebregts, Clark J; Nicolaides, Andrew N. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1874-1754. - STAMPA. - 371:(2023), pp. 406-412. [10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.045]
Paraskevas, Kosmas I; Spence, J David; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P; Antignani, Pier Luigi; Gloviczki, Peter; Eckstein, Hans-Henning; Spinelli, Francesco; Stilo, Francesco; Saba, Luca; Poredos, Pavel; Dardik, Alan; Liapis, Christos D; Mansilha, Armando; Faggioli, Gianluca; Pini, Rodolfo; Jezovnik, Mateja K; Sultan, Sherif; Musiałek, Piotr; Goudot, Guillaume; Lavenson, George S; Jawien, Arkadiusz; Blinc, Aleš; Myrcha, Piotr; Fernandes E Fernandes, Jose; Geroulakos, George; Kakkos, Stavros K; Knoflach, Michael; Proczka, Robert M; Capoccia, Laura; Rundek, Tatjana; Svetlikov, Alexei S; Silvestrini, Mauro; Ricco, Jean-Baptiste; Davies, Alun H; Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo; Suri, Jasjit S; Lanza, Gaetano; Fraedrich, Gustav; Zeebregts, Clark J; Nicolaides, Andrew N
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/917095
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact