Objective: To report the mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR). Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent F-BEVAR for pEVAR or pOAR from 2006-2021 from 17 European vascular centres were analyzed. Endpoints included technical success, major adverse events (MAE), 30-day mortality, and 5-year estimates of survival, target vessel primary patency, freedom from reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks, and sac growth >5 mm. Summary background data: Treatment of a failed previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is a complex undertaking. F-BEVAR is becoming an increasingly attractive option, although comparative data are limited regarding associated risk factors, indications for treatment, and various outcomes. Results: There were 526 patients included, 268 pOAR and 258 pEVAR. Median time from previous repair to F-BEVAR was 7 (IQR, 4-12) years, 5 (3-8) for pEVAR and 10 (6-14) for pOAR, P<0.001. Predominant indication for treatment was Type Ia endoleak for pEVAR and progression of disease for pOAR. Technical success was 92.8%, pOAR (92.2%) and pEVAR (93.4%), P=0.58. The 30-day mortality was 6.5% overall, 6.7% for pOAR and 6.2% for pEVAR, P=0.81. There were 1853 treated target vessels with 5-year estimates of primary patency of 94.4%, pEVAR (95.2%) and pOAR (94.4%), P=0.03. Five-year estimates for freedom from type I/III endoleaks were similar between groups; freedom from reintervention was lower for pEVAR (38.3%) than for pOAR (56.0%), P=0.004 The most common indication for reinterventions was for type I/III endoleaks (37.5%). Conclusions: Repair of a failed previous EVAR or OAR is safe and feasible with comparable technical success and survival rates. While successful treatment can be achieved, significant rates of reintervention should be anticipated, particularly for issues related to instability of target vessels/bridging stents.

Budtz-Lilly, J., D'Oria, M., Gallitto, E., Bertoglio, L., Kölbel, T., Lindström, D., et al. (2023). European Multicentric Experience with Fenestrated-Branched ENDOvascular Stent-grafting after Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: the EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 278(2), e389-e395 [10.1097/SLA.0000000000005577].

European Multicentric Experience with Fenestrated-Branched ENDOvascular Stent-grafting after Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: the EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry

Gallitto, Enrico;Spath, Paolo;Logiacco, Antonino;Gargiulo, Mauro;
2023

Abstract

Objective: To report the mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR). Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent F-BEVAR for pEVAR or pOAR from 2006-2021 from 17 European vascular centres were analyzed. Endpoints included technical success, major adverse events (MAE), 30-day mortality, and 5-year estimates of survival, target vessel primary patency, freedom from reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks, and sac growth >5 mm. Summary background data: Treatment of a failed previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is a complex undertaking. F-BEVAR is becoming an increasingly attractive option, although comparative data are limited regarding associated risk factors, indications for treatment, and various outcomes. Results: There were 526 patients included, 268 pOAR and 258 pEVAR. Median time from previous repair to F-BEVAR was 7 (IQR, 4-12) years, 5 (3-8) for pEVAR and 10 (6-14) for pOAR, P<0.001. Predominant indication for treatment was Type Ia endoleak for pEVAR and progression of disease for pOAR. Technical success was 92.8%, pOAR (92.2%) and pEVAR (93.4%), P=0.58. The 30-day mortality was 6.5% overall, 6.7% for pOAR and 6.2% for pEVAR, P=0.81. There were 1853 treated target vessels with 5-year estimates of primary patency of 94.4%, pEVAR (95.2%) and pOAR (94.4%), P=0.03. Five-year estimates for freedom from type I/III endoleaks were similar between groups; freedom from reintervention was lower for pEVAR (38.3%) than for pOAR (56.0%), P=0.004 The most common indication for reinterventions was for type I/III endoleaks (37.5%). Conclusions: Repair of a failed previous EVAR or OAR is safe and feasible with comparable technical success and survival rates. While successful treatment can be achieved, significant rates of reintervention should be anticipated, particularly for issues related to instability of target vessels/bridging stents.
2023
Budtz-Lilly, J., D'Oria, M., Gallitto, E., Bertoglio, L., Kölbel, T., Lindström, D., et al. (2023). European Multicentric Experience with Fenestrated-Branched ENDOvascular Stent-grafting after Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: the EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 278(2), e389-e395 [10.1097/SLA.0000000000005577].
Budtz-Lilly, Jacob; D'Oria, Mario; Gallitto, Enrico; Bertoglio, Luca; Kölbel, Tilo; Lindström, David; Dias, Nuno; Lundberg, Goran; Böckler, Dittmar; P...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
35837956 European_Multicentric_Experience_with_AM130.pdf.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 1.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.65 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/914305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact