Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.

Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey / Mengardo V.; Weindelmayer J.; Veltri A.; Giacopuzzi S.; Torroni L.; de Manzoni G.; Agresta F.; Alfieri R.; Alfieri S.; Antonacci N.; Baiocchi G.L.; Bencini L.; Bencivenga M.; Benedetti M.; Berselli M.; Biondi A.; Capolupo G.T.; Carboni F.; Casadei R.; Casella F.; Catarci M.; Cerri P.; Chiari D.; Cocozza E.; Colombo G.; Cozzaglio L.; Dalmonte G.; Degiuli M.; De Luca M.; De Luca R.; De Manzini N.; De Pasqual C.A.; De Pascale S.; De Ruvo N.; Di Cosmo M.; Di Leo A.; Di Paola M.; Elio A.; Ferrara F.; Ferrari G.; Fiscon V.; Fumagalli U.; Garulli G.; Gennai A.; Gentile I.; Germani P.; Gualtierotti M.; Guerini F.; Gurrado A.; Inama M.; La Torre F.; Laterza E.; Losurdo P.; Macri A.; Marano A.; Marano L.; Marchesi F.; Marino F.; Massani M.; Menghi R.; Milone M.; Molfino S.; Montuori M.; Moretto G.; Morgagni P.; Morpurgo E.; Abdallah M.; Nespoli L.; Olmi S.; Palaia R.; Pallabazer G.; Parise P.; Pasculli A.; Pericoli Ridolfini M.; Pesce A.; Pinotti E.; Pisano M.; Poiasina E.; Postiglione V.; Rausei S.; Rella A.; Rosa F.; Rosati R.; Rossi G.; Rossit L.; Rovatti M.; Ruspi L.; Sacco L.; Saladino E.; Sansonetti A.; Sartori A.; Scaglione D.; Scaringi S.; Schoenthaler C.; Sena G.; Simone M.; Solaini L.; Strignano P.; Tartaglia N.; Testa S.; Testini M.; Tiberio G.A.M.; Treppiedi E.; Vagliasindi A.; Valmasoni M.; Vigano J.; Zanchettin G.; Zanoni A.; Zardini C.; Zerbinati A.. - In: UPDATES IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2038-131X. - STAMPA. - 74:6(2022), pp. 1839-1849. [10.1007/s13304-022-01397-0]

Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey

Casadei R.;Solaini L.;
2022

Abstract

Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.
2022
Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey / Mengardo V.; Weindelmayer J.; Veltri A.; Giacopuzzi S.; Torroni L.; de Manzoni G.; Agresta F.; Alfieri R.; Alfieri S.; Antonacci N.; Baiocchi G.L.; Bencini L.; Bencivenga M.; Benedetti M.; Berselli M.; Biondi A.; Capolupo G.T.; Carboni F.; Casadei R.; Casella F.; Catarci M.; Cerri P.; Chiari D.; Cocozza E.; Colombo G.; Cozzaglio L.; Dalmonte G.; Degiuli M.; De Luca M.; De Luca R.; De Manzini N.; De Pasqual C.A.; De Pascale S.; De Ruvo N.; Di Cosmo M.; Di Leo A.; Di Paola M.; Elio A.; Ferrara F.; Ferrari G.; Fiscon V.; Fumagalli U.; Garulli G.; Gennai A.; Gentile I.; Germani P.; Gualtierotti M.; Guerini F.; Gurrado A.; Inama M.; La Torre F.; Laterza E.; Losurdo P.; Macri A.; Marano A.; Marano L.; Marchesi F.; Marino F.; Massani M.; Menghi R.; Milone M.; Molfino S.; Montuori M.; Moretto G.; Morgagni P.; Morpurgo E.; Abdallah M.; Nespoli L.; Olmi S.; Palaia R.; Pallabazer G.; Parise P.; Pasculli A.; Pericoli Ridolfini M.; Pesce A.; Pinotti E.; Pisano M.; Poiasina E.; Postiglione V.; Rausei S.; Rella A.; Rosa F.; Rosati R.; Rossi G.; Rossit L.; Rovatti M.; Ruspi L.; Sacco L.; Saladino E.; Sansonetti A.; Sartori A.; Scaglione D.; Scaringi S.; Schoenthaler C.; Sena G.; Simone M.; Solaini L.; Strignano P.; Tartaglia N.; Testa S.; Testini M.; Tiberio G.A.M.; Treppiedi E.; Vagliasindi A.; Valmasoni M.; Vigano J.; Zanchettin G.; Zanoni A.; Zardini C.; Zerbinati A.. - In: UPDATES IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2038-131X. - STAMPA. - 74:6(2022), pp. 1839-1849. [10.1007/s13304-022-01397-0]
Mengardo V.; Weindelmayer J.; Veltri A.; Giacopuzzi S.; Torroni L.; de Manzoni G.; Agresta F.; Alfieri R.; Alfieri S.; Antonacci N.; Baiocchi G.L.; Bencini L.; Bencivenga M.; Benedetti M.; Berselli M.; Biondi A.; Capolupo G.T.; Carboni F.; Casadei R.; Casella F.; Catarci M.; Cerri P.; Chiari D.; Cocozza E.; Colombo G.; Cozzaglio L.; Dalmonte G.; Degiuli M.; De Luca M.; De Luca R.; De Manzini N.; De Pasqual C.A.; De Pascale S.; De Ruvo N.; Di Cosmo M.; Di Leo A.; Di Paola M.; Elio A.; Ferrara F.; Ferrari G.; Fiscon V.; Fumagalli U.; Garulli G.; Gennai A.; Gentile I.; Germani P.; Gualtierotti M.; Guerini F.; Gurrado A.; Inama M.; La Torre F.; Laterza E.; Losurdo P.; Macri A.; Marano A.; Marano L.; Marchesi F.; Marino F.; Massani M.; Menghi R.; Milone M.; Molfino S.; Montuori M.; Moretto G.; Morgagni P.; Morpurgo E.; Abdallah M.; Nespoli L.; Olmi S.; Palaia R.; Pallabazer G.; Parise P.; Pasculli A.; Pericoli Ridolfini M.; Pesce A.; Pinotti E.; Pisano M.; Poiasina E.; Postiglione V.; Rausei S.; Rella A.; Rosa F.; Rosati R.; Rossi G.; Rossit L.; Rovatti M.; Ruspi L.; Sacco L.; Saladino E.; Sansonetti A.; Sartori A.; Scaglione D.; Scaringi S.; Schoenthaler C.; Sena G.; Simone M.; Solaini L.; Strignano P.; Tartaglia N.; Testa S.; Testini M.; Tiberio G.A.M.; Treppiedi E.; Vagliasindi A.; Valmasoni M.; Vigano J.; Zanchettin G.; Zanoni A.; Zardini C.; Zerbinati A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13304-022-01397-0.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
13304_2022_1397_MOESM1_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 33.31 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
33.31 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/907612
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact