Ablative techniques emerged as effective alternative to nephron-sparing surgery for treatment of small renal masses. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRYO) are the two guidelines-recommended techniques. Microwave ablation (MWA) represents a newer technology, less described. Aim of the study was to compare outcomes of MWA to those of CRYO and RFA.
Pandolfo, S.D., Carbonara, U., Beksac, A.T., Derweesh, I., Celia, A., Schiavina, R., et al. (2023). Microwave versus cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass: a multicenter comparative analysis. MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 75, 66-72 [10.23736/S2724-6051.22.05092-3].
Microwave versus cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass: a multicenter comparative analysis
Schiavina, Riccardo;Bianchi, Lorenzo;
2023
Abstract
Ablative techniques emerged as effective alternative to nephron-sparing surgery for treatment of small renal masses. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRYO) are the two guidelines-recommended techniques. Microwave ablation (MWA) represents a newer technology, less described. Aim of the study was to compare outcomes of MWA to those of CRYO and RFA.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AM_Microwae.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione
2.76 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.76 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
