Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, post-traumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Study Design and Setting: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (November 9, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines. Results: Measurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate- or high-quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS, and PFActS-C, whereas the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash. Conclusion: Until further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS, or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims.

A systematic review shows minimal evidence for measurement properties of psychological functioning outcomes in whiplash / Ritchie C.; Andersen T.E.; Ravn S.L.; Soderlund A.; Sterling M.; Carroll L.; Connelly L.B.; Cote P.; Curatolo M.; Grant G.; Jull G.; Kasch H.; MacDermid J.; Malmstrom E.M.; Rebbeck T.; Treleaven J.; Walton D.; Westergren H.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - ELETTRONICO. - 151:(2022), pp. 29-44. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.011]

A systematic review shows minimal evidence for measurement properties of psychological functioning outcomes in whiplash

Connelly L. B.;
2022

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, post-traumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Study Design and Setting: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (November 9, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines. Results: Measurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate- or high-quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS, and PFActS-C, whereas the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash. Conclusion: Until further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS, or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims.
2022
A systematic review shows minimal evidence for measurement properties of psychological functioning outcomes in whiplash / Ritchie C.; Andersen T.E.; Ravn S.L.; Soderlund A.; Sterling M.; Carroll L.; Connelly L.B.; Cote P.; Curatolo M.; Grant G.; Jull G.; Kasch H.; MacDermid J.; Malmstrom E.M.; Rebbeck T.; Treleaven J.; Walton D.; Westergren H.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - ELETTRONICO. - 151:(2022), pp. 29-44. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.011]
Ritchie C.; Andersen T.E.; Ravn S.L.; Soderlund A.; Sterling M.; Carroll L.; Connelly L.B.; Cote P.; Curatolo M.; Grant G.; Jull G.; Kasch H.; MacDermid J.; Malmstrom E.M.; Rebbeck T.; Treleaven J.; Walton D.; Westergren H.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/906269
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact