Severe pain is frequent in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDCA). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high local control rates in these patients. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the available evidence on pain relief in patients with PDCA. We updated our previous systematic review through a search on PubMed of papers published from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2021. Studies with full available text, published in English, and reporting pain relief after SBRT on PDCA were included in this analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the MEDCALC statistical software. All tests were two-sided. The I-2 statistic was used to quantify statistical heterogeneity (high heterogeneity level: >50%). Nineteen papers were included in this updated literature review. None of them specifically aimed at assessing pain and/or quality of life. The rate of analgesics reduction or suspension ranged between 40.0 and 100.0% (median: 60.3%) in six studies. The pooled rate was 71.5% (95% CI, 61.6-80.0%), with high heterogeneity between studies (Q(2) test: p < 0.0001; I-2 = 83.8%). The rate of complete response of pain after SBRT ranged between 30.0 and 81.3% (median: 48.4%) in three studies. The pooled rate was 51.9% (95% CI, 39.3-64.3%), with high heterogeneity (Q(2) test: p < 0.008; I-2 = 79.1%). The rate of partial plus complete pain response ranged between 44.4 and 100% (median: 78.6%) in nine studies. The pooled rate was 78.3% (95% CI, 71.0-84.5%), with high heterogeneity (Q(2) test: p < 0.0001; I-2 = 79.4%). A linear regression with sensitivity analysis showed significantly improved overall pain response as the EQD2 alpha/beta:10 increases (p: 0.005). Eight papers did not report any side effect during and after SBRT. In three studies only transient acute effects were recorded. The results of the included studies showed high heterogeneity. However, SBRT of PDCA resulted reasonably effective in producing pain relief in these patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of SBRT in this setting based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Pain Relief after Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review / Buwenge, Milly; Arcelli, Alessandra; Cellini, Francesco; Deodato, Francesco; Macchia, Gabriella; Cilla, Savino; Galietta, Erika; Strigari, Lidia; Malizia, Claudio; Cammelli, Silvia; Morganti, Alessio G. - In: CURRENT ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1718-7729. - ELETTRONICO. - 29:4(2022), pp. 2616-2629. [10.3390/curroncol29040214]

Pain Relief after Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review

Buwenge, Milly
;
Galietta, Erika;Cammelli, Silvia;Morganti, Alessio G
2022

Abstract

Severe pain is frequent in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDCA). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high local control rates in these patients. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the available evidence on pain relief in patients with PDCA. We updated our previous systematic review through a search on PubMed of papers published from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2021. Studies with full available text, published in English, and reporting pain relief after SBRT on PDCA were included in this analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the MEDCALC statistical software. All tests were two-sided. The I-2 statistic was used to quantify statistical heterogeneity (high heterogeneity level: >50%). Nineteen papers were included in this updated literature review. None of them specifically aimed at assessing pain and/or quality of life. The rate of analgesics reduction or suspension ranged between 40.0 and 100.0% (median: 60.3%) in six studies. The pooled rate was 71.5% (95% CI, 61.6-80.0%), with high heterogeneity between studies (Q(2) test: p < 0.0001; I-2 = 83.8%). The rate of complete response of pain after SBRT ranged between 30.0 and 81.3% (median: 48.4%) in three studies. The pooled rate was 51.9% (95% CI, 39.3-64.3%), with high heterogeneity (Q(2) test: p < 0.008; I-2 = 79.1%). The rate of partial plus complete pain response ranged between 44.4 and 100% (median: 78.6%) in nine studies. The pooled rate was 78.3% (95% CI, 71.0-84.5%), with high heterogeneity (Q(2) test: p < 0.0001; I-2 = 79.4%). A linear regression with sensitivity analysis showed significantly improved overall pain response as the EQD2 alpha/beta:10 increases (p: 0.005). Eight papers did not report any side effect during and after SBRT. In three studies only transient acute effects were recorded. The results of the included studies showed high heterogeneity. However, SBRT of PDCA resulted reasonably effective in producing pain relief in these patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of SBRT in this setting based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
2022
Pain Relief after Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review / Buwenge, Milly; Arcelli, Alessandra; Cellini, Francesco; Deodato, Francesco; Macchia, Gabriella; Cilla, Savino; Galietta, Erika; Strigari, Lidia; Malizia, Claudio; Cammelli, Silvia; Morganti, Alessio G. - In: CURRENT ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1718-7729. - ELETTRONICO. - 29:4(2022), pp. 2616-2629. [10.3390/curroncol29040214]
Buwenge, Milly; Arcelli, Alessandra; Cellini, Francesco; Deodato, Francesco; Macchia, Gabriella; Cilla, Savino; Galietta, Erika; Strigari, Lidia; Malizia, Claudio; Cammelli, Silvia; Morganti, Alessio G
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pain_relief.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 3.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
curroncol-29-00214-s001.zip

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 275.32 kB
Formato Zip File
275.32 kB Zip File Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/905705
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact