This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of patient-specific 3D-printed guides (MySpine® Medacta, Switzerland) for pedicle screw placement in spine revision surgery. Overview of the Literature: Placement of pedicle screws in spine revision surgery can be challenging due to the loss of anatomical landmarks and the presence of a fusion mass. Nevertheless, only a few papers have dealt with this topic. Several strategies, ranging from the freehand technique to navigation and robotics, have been developed. However, they all have drawbacks, including the amount of radiation given to the patient, the complexity of the equipment with a consequent increase in surgical time or costs, and the need of extended surgical training. Therefore, no consensus has yet been found regarding the best choice for dealing with revisions. Recently, patient-specific 3D-printed guides for screw placement have been introduced. Prospective studies have demonstrated their superiority over the freehand technique in primary deformity cases, but there are no studies on their results in revisions.
Accuracy of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Guides for Pedicle Screw Insertion in Spine Revision Surgery: Results of a Retrospective Study
Faldini, Cesare;Barile, Francesca;Cerasoli, Tosca;Ialuna, Marco;Viroli, Giovanni;Manzetti, Marco;Traversari, Matteo;Mazzotti, Antonio;Ruffilli, Alberto
2022
Abstract
This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of patient-specific 3D-printed guides (MySpine® Medacta, Switzerland) for pedicle screw placement in spine revision surgery. Overview of the Literature: Placement of pedicle screws in spine revision surgery can be challenging due to the loss of anatomical landmarks and the presence of a fusion mass. Nevertheless, only a few papers have dealt with this topic. Several strategies, ranging from the freehand technique to navigation and robotics, have been developed. However, they all have drawbacks, including the amount of radiation given to the patient, the complexity of the equipment with a consequent increase in surgical time or costs, and the need of extended surgical training. Therefore, no consensus has yet been found regarding the best choice for dealing with revisions. Recently, patient-specific 3D-printed guides for screw placement have been introduced. Prospective studies have demonstrated their superiority over the freehand technique in primary deformity cases, but there are no studies on their results in revisions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
