A RC-framed-skin technology for the integrated seismic and thermal retrofitting interventions on existing buildings, recently proposed by some of the authors, is thoroughly investigated. By means of numerical analyses, its effectiveness and suitability within the framework of seismic risk class assessment is proved. The system is composed of a RC-framed structure with an external reinforced plaster layer that does not offer a structural contribution to the capacity of the system in ultimate conditions, but which can be effective by increasing the lateral stiffness in serviceability conditions. The system is realized from the outside of the existing building so guaranteeing limited invasiveness of the intervention and preventing the interruption of the building use by their occupants. An existing RC building, representative of a typical example of the Italian building stock, is analyzed as a case study, and its seismic risk class upgrade, obtained by the proposed strengthening intervention, is assessed by non-linear static analysis. The numerical models are developed within the OpenSees framework. The Expected Annual Loss (EAL) parameter, together with the Life Safety Index (LS-I), are chosen as synthetic measures that include both aspects related to Ultimate Limit state (ULS) and Serviceability Limit State (SLS) conditions. The risk class accounting for or disregarding the contribution of the external reinforced plaster are finally compared.

Diego Alejandro Talledo, R.F. (2022). Seismic risk assessment of a new RC-framed skin technology for integrated retrofitting interventions on existing buildings. Structural Integrity [10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.119].

Seismic risk assessment of a new RC-framed skin technology for integrated retrofitting interventions on existing buildings

Luca Pozza;Marco Savoia;
2022

Abstract

A RC-framed-skin technology for the integrated seismic and thermal retrofitting interventions on existing buildings, recently proposed by some of the authors, is thoroughly investigated. By means of numerical analyses, its effectiveness and suitability within the framework of seismic risk class assessment is proved. The system is composed of a RC-framed structure with an external reinforced plaster layer that does not offer a structural contribution to the capacity of the system in ultimate conditions, but which can be effective by increasing the lateral stiffness in serviceability conditions. The system is realized from the outside of the existing building so guaranteeing limited invasiveness of the intervention and preventing the interruption of the building use by their occupants. An existing RC building, representative of a typical example of the Italian building stock, is analyzed as a case study, and its seismic risk class upgrade, obtained by the proposed strengthening intervention, is assessed by non-linear static analysis. The numerical models are developed within the OpenSees framework. The Expected Annual Loss (EAL) parameter, together with the Life Safety Index (LS-I), are chosen as synthetic measures that include both aspects related to Ultimate Limit state (ULS) and Serviceability Limit State (SLS) conditions. The risk class accounting for or disregarding the contribution of the external reinforced plaster are finally compared.
2022
Proceedings of the ANIDIS Conference (Torino, Settembre 2022)
918
925
Diego Alejandro Talledo, R.F. (2022). Seismic risk assessment of a new RC-framed skin technology for integrated retrofitting interventions on existing buildings. Structural Integrity [10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.119].
Diego Alejandro Talledo, Rita Federico, Irene Rocca, Luca Pozza, Marco Savoia, Anna Saetta
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2452321623001269-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.65 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/903946
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact