Can the perpetrator or the collaborator“speak”? How, and forwhom? Do they have a“right to a biography”and, if so, what arethe terms of this right? Who can speak for them? In short, whatdoes it mean to work through their lives and the crimes theycommitted for those who decide to tell their stories? The maingoal of this paper is to answer these questions using a particularkind of documentary directed by those who, in a certain momentof their lives, have discovered that a member of their families wasa perpetrator or a collaborator relating to a dictatorship. UsingLotman’s theory of culture and memory, we discuss thepositionalities of those who“wrote”these documentaries, locatedconstantly between the individual and the collectivesemiosphere. Taking into account two case studies–El pacto deAdrianadirected by Lissette Orozco (Chile, 2017) andL’occhio divetrodirected by Duccio Charini (Italy, 2020)–we look at themechanisms of investigation and recollection that they use and“show,”in order to elucidate family secrets within the broadercontexts of the collective traumas of Chile’s and Italy’s post-conflict societies

Remembering the other, repositioning oneself. The right to a biography and autocommunication in perpetrator and collaborator descendant documentaries

C. Demaria
Co-primo
;
2022

Abstract

Can the perpetrator or the collaborator“speak”? How, and forwhom? Do they have a“right to a biography”and, if so, what arethe terms of this right? Who can speak for them? In short, whatdoes it mean to work through their lives and the crimes theycommitted for those who decide to tell their stories? The maingoal of this paper is to answer these questions using a particularkind of documentary directed by those who, in a certain momentof their lives, have discovered that a member of their families wasa perpetrator or a collaborator relating to a dictatorship. UsingLotman’s theory of culture and memory, we discuss thepositionalities of those who“wrote”these documentaries, locatedconstantly between the individual and the collectivesemiosphere. Taking into account two case studies–El pacto deAdrianadirected by Lissette Orozco (Chile, 2017) andL’occhio divetrodirected by Duccio Charini (Italy, 2020)–we look at themechanisms of investigation and recollection that they use and“show,”in order to elucidate family secrets within the broadercontexts of the collective traumas of Chile’s and Italy’s post-conflict societies
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/903530
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact