Aim: The influence of humans on large carnivores, including wolves, is a worldwide conservation concern. In addition, human-caused changes in carnivore density and distribution might have impacts on prey and, indirectly, on vegetation. We therefore tested wolf responses to infrastructure related to natural resource development (i.e., human footprint). Location: Our study provides one of the most extensive assessments of how predators like wolves select habitat in response to various degrees of footprint across boreal ecosystems encompassing over a million square kilometers of Canada. Methods: We deployed GPS-collars on 172 wolves, monitored movements and used a generalized functional response (GFR) model of resource selection. A functional response in habitat selection occurs when selection varies as a function of the availability of that habitat. GFRs can clarify how human-induced habitat changes are influencing wildlife across large, diverse landscapes. Results: Wolves displayed a functional response to footprint. Wolves were more likely to select forest harvest cutblocks in regions with higher cutblock density (i.e., a positive functional response to high-quality habitats for ungulate prey) and to select for higher road density in regions where road density was high (i.e., a positive functional response to human-created travel routes). Wolves were more likely to use cutblocks in habitats with low road densities, and more likely to use roads in habitats with low cutblock densities, except in winter when wolves were more likely to use roads regardless of cutblock density. Main conclusions: These interactions suggest that wolves trade-off among human-impacted habitats, and adaptively switch from using roads to facilitate movement (while also risking encounters with humans), to using cutblocks that may have higher ungulate densities. We recommend that conservation managers consider the contextual and interacting effects of footprints when assessing impacts on carnivores. These effects likely have indirect impacts on ecosystems too, including on prey species.

Functional response of wolves to human development across boreal North America / Muhly T.B.; Johnson C.A.; Hebblewhite M.; Neilson E.W.; Fortin D.; Fryxell J.M.; Latham A.D.M.; Latham M.C.; McLoughlin P.D.; Merrill E.; Paquet P.C.; Patterson B.R.; Schmiegelow F.; Scurrah F.; Musiani M.. - In: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION. - ISSN 2045-7758. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:18(2019), pp. 10801-10815. [10.1002/ece3.5600]

Functional response of wolves to human development across boreal North America

Musiani M.
2019

Abstract

Aim: The influence of humans on large carnivores, including wolves, is a worldwide conservation concern. In addition, human-caused changes in carnivore density and distribution might have impacts on prey and, indirectly, on vegetation. We therefore tested wolf responses to infrastructure related to natural resource development (i.e., human footprint). Location: Our study provides one of the most extensive assessments of how predators like wolves select habitat in response to various degrees of footprint across boreal ecosystems encompassing over a million square kilometers of Canada. Methods: We deployed GPS-collars on 172 wolves, monitored movements and used a generalized functional response (GFR) model of resource selection. A functional response in habitat selection occurs when selection varies as a function of the availability of that habitat. GFRs can clarify how human-induced habitat changes are influencing wildlife across large, diverse landscapes. Results: Wolves displayed a functional response to footprint. Wolves were more likely to select forest harvest cutblocks in regions with higher cutblock density (i.e., a positive functional response to high-quality habitats for ungulate prey) and to select for higher road density in regions where road density was high (i.e., a positive functional response to human-created travel routes). Wolves were more likely to use cutblocks in habitats with low road densities, and more likely to use roads in habitats with low cutblock densities, except in winter when wolves were more likely to use roads regardless of cutblock density. Main conclusions: These interactions suggest that wolves trade-off among human-impacted habitats, and adaptively switch from using roads to facilitate movement (while also risking encounters with humans), to using cutblocks that may have higher ungulate densities. We recommend that conservation managers consider the contextual and interacting effects of footprints when assessing impacts on carnivores. These effects likely have indirect impacts on ecosystems too, including on prey species.
2019
Functional response of wolves to human development across boreal North America / Muhly T.B.; Johnson C.A.; Hebblewhite M.; Neilson E.W.; Fortin D.; Fryxell J.M.; Latham A.D.M.; Latham M.C.; McLoughlin P.D.; Merrill E.; Paquet P.C.; Patterson B.R.; Schmiegelow F.; Scurrah F.; Musiani M.. - In: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION. - ISSN 2045-7758. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:18(2019), pp. 10801-10815. [10.1002/ece3.5600]
Muhly T.B.; Johnson C.A.; Hebblewhite M.; Neilson E.W.; Fortin D.; Fryxell J.M.; Latham A.D.M.; Latham M.C.; McLoughlin P.D.; Merrill E.; Paquet P.C.; Patterson B.R.; Schmiegelow F.; Scurrah F.; Musiani M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/903168
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact