The Italian response to the pandemic – the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan – does not constitute a tool for managing European funding or a spending project, but rather presents itself as a complex act of strategic and economic planning, which not only identifies objectives to be achieved, gaps to be filled, shortcomings to be corrected, but also outlines a path of public action to build a governance model of economic and social development. The State returns to being “The State” and regains its proper field of activity, in a legal order based on territorial autonomies. The national recovery and resilience planning, with its parallel economic planning, has the final goal to fight inequality, the latter considered as the obstacle to the homogeneous economic development in the country: cohesion, inclusion, innovation and sustainability therefore constitute the most effective path for reducing inequality. In this context, the local public services become the fundamental tools for correcting dysfunctions, fragility, and inequalities, with the effect that the administrative activity – on whose discipline the government is increasing its influence – will be evaluated more and more in terms of performances. This process will probably lead to a different approach also by the Court of Auditors and administrative judges in reviewing the work of public administrations.

Il presente contributo tratta dell'intervento pubblico dello Stato per l'inclusione, la coesione, l'innovazione e la sostenibilità a seguito e in conseguenza dell'adozione del PNRR, e del ruolo del servizio pubblico locale, nella sua nuova accezione.

L'intervento pubblico per l'inclusione, la coesione, l'innovazione e la sostenibilità ed il ruolo del servizio pubblico locale nel Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza

Marco Dugato
2022

Abstract

The Italian response to the pandemic – the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan – does not constitute a tool for managing European funding or a spending project, but rather presents itself as a complex act of strategic and economic planning, which not only identifies objectives to be achieved, gaps to be filled, shortcomings to be corrected, but also outlines a path of public action to build a governance model of economic and social development. The State returns to being “The State” and regains its proper field of activity, in a legal order based on territorial autonomies. The national recovery and resilience planning, with its parallel economic planning, has the final goal to fight inequality, the latter considered as the obstacle to the homogeneous economic development in the country: cohesion, inclusion, innovation and sustainability therefore constitute the most effective path for reducing inequality. In this context, the local public services become the fundamental tools for correcting dysfunctions, fragility, and inequalities, with the effect that the administrative activity – on whose discipline the government is increasing its influence – will be evaluated more and more in terms of performances. This process will probably lead to a different approach also by the Court of Auditors and administrative judges in reviewing the work of public administrations.
2022
Marco Dugato
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DUGATOMunus1.2022.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 694.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
694.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/902353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact