BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. RESULTS: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). CONCLUSION: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.
Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study / Giani A.; van Ramshorst T.; Mazzola M.; Bassi C.; Esposito A.; de Pastena M.; Edwin B.; Sahakyan M.; Kleive D.; Jah A.; van Laarhoven S.; Boggi U.; Kauffman E.F.; Casadei R.; Ricci C.; Dokmak S.; Fteriche F.S.; White S.A.; Kamarajah S.K.; Butturini G.; Frigerio I.; Zerbi A.; Capretti G.; Pando E.; Sutcliffe R.P.; Marudanayagam R.; Fusai G.K.; Fabre J.M.; Bjornsson B.; Timmermann L.; Soonawalla Z.; Burdio F.; Keck T.; Hackert T.; Groot Koerkamp B.; d'Hondt M.; Coratti A.; Pessaux P.; Pietrabissa A.; Al-Sarireh B.; Marino M.V.; Molenaar Q.; Yip V.; Besselink M.; Ferrari G.; Hilal M.A.. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1365-2168. - ELETTRONICO. - 109:11(2022), pp. 1124-1130. [10.1093/bjs/znac204]
Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study
Casadei R.;Ricci C.;Capretti G.;
2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. RESULTS: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). CONCLUSION: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
