The technique known as fladry, traditionally used to hunt wolves (Canis lupus) in Eastern Europe and Russia, consists of driving them into a bottleneck formed by 50 × 10-cm red flags hanging from ropes stretched over the ground. The technique also has been used to livetrap wild wolves. The aim of our study was to assess whether 5 captive wolves living in 2 enclosures (120 m2 and 85 m2) also responded to fladry. We found that avoidance was maximal when flags were ≤50 cm apart and their base was at ground level. In these conditions, wolves never crossed red flags (or gray flags of the same brightness) intersecting their usual stereotyped routes (baseline: 4.08 ± 3.11 SD trespasses/min), even when the daily food ration was placed on the other side of them. In contrast, trespasses occurred when inter-flag distances were ≥75 cm or rope heights were ≤25 cm or ≥75 cm. Wolves bit at the uncrossed barriers significantly more than the crossed ones (P<0.02). Our results indicated that: 1) fladry is effective on captive wolves and 2) fladry can be used to confine wolves into limited spaces and to prevent them from accessing food, at least for a brief time. Our study provides additional evidence that this technique has potential for wolf management and to protect livestock from wolf depredation.

Musiani M., Visalberghi E. (2001). Effectiveness of fladry on wolves in captivity. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 29(1), 91-98.

Effectiveness of fladry on wolves in captivity

Musiani M.
;
2001

Abstract

The technique known as fladry, traditionally used to hunt wolves (Canis lupus) in Eastern Europe and Russia, consists of driving them into a bottleneck formed by 50 × 10-cm red flags hanging from ropes stretched over the ground. The technique also has been used to livetrap wild wolves. The aim of our study was to assess whether 5 captive wolves living in 2 enclosures (120 m2 and 85 m2) also responded to fladry. We found that avoidance was maximal when flags were ≤50 cm apart and their base was at ground level. In these conditions, wolves never crossed red flags (or gray flags of the same brightness) intersecting their usual stereotyped routes (baseline: 4.08 ± 3.11 SD trespasses/min), even when the daily food ration was placed on the other side of them. In contrast, trespasses occurred when inter-flag distances were ≥75 cm or rope heights were ≤25 cm or ≥75 cm. Wolves bit at the uncrossed barriers significantly more than the crossed ones (P<0.02). Our results indicated that: 1) fladry is effective on captive wolves and 2) fladry can be used to confine wolves into limited spaces and to prevent them from accessing food, at least for a brief time. Our study provides additional evidence that this technique has potential for wolf management and to protect livestock from wolf depredation.
2001
Musiani M., Visalberghi E. (2001). Effectiveness of fladry on wolves in captivity. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 29(1), 91-98.
Musiani M.; Visalberghi E.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/901479
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact