The date of the volcanic eruption of Santorini that caused extensive damage toMinoanCrete has been controversial since the 1980s. Some have placed the event in the late seventeenth century BC. Others have made the case for a younger date of around 1500 BC. A recent contribution to that controversy has been the dating of an olive tree branch preserved within the volcanic ash fall on Santorini. In this debate feature Paolo Cherubini and colleagues argue that the olive tree dating (which supports the older chronology) is unreliable on a number of grounds. There follows a response fromthe authors of that dating, and comments fromother specialists,with a closing reply from Cherubini and his team.
Friedrich, W.L., Kromer, B., Friedrich, M., Heinemeier, J., Pfeiffer, T., Talamo, S. (2015). The olive branch chronology stands irrespective of tree-ring counting. ANTIQUITY, 88(339), 274-277 [10.1017/S0003598X00050377].
The olive branch chronology stands irrespective of tree-ring counting
Talamo, Sahra
2015
Abstract
The date of the volcanic eruption of Santorini that caused extensive damage toMinoanCrete has been controversial since the 1980s. Some have placed the event in the late seventeenth century BC. Others have made the case for a younger date of around 1500 BC. A recent contribution to that controversy has been the dating of an olive tree branch preserved within the volcanic ash fall on Santorini. In this debate feature Paolo Cherubini and colleagues argue that the olive tree dating (which supports the older chronology) is unreliable on a number of grounds. There follows a response fromthe authors of that dating, and comments fromother specialists,with a closing reply from Cherubini and his team.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.