Despite the actual availability of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the pandemic, many people are still vacillating in their decision to vaccinate. In this study, we considered the effect of two relevant contextual issues on vaccination intention: the number of people infected with COVID-19 is increasing, and the pace of vaccination is gaining speed. Specifically, we hypothesized that having already contracted SARS-CoV-2 (post-positive reluctance) could lead people to underestimate the importance of vaccination. Moreover, as the number of vaccinated people increases, more hesitant people could fall into the free-riding intention category, benefitting from the immunity provided by others' vaccinations. Vaccine hesitancy becomes more critical as the vaccination campaign proceeds: at one point, it will be inevitable to deal with hesitant people. This study is part of a WHO Regional Office for Europe project and involved a representative sample of 5006 Italians interviewed in January–February 2021. In case of post-positive reluctance, both young age and female gender increase vaccine hesitancy, while a high level of education reduces free-riding intention. Considering post-positive reluctance and free riding, a protective effect on hesitancy is associated with negative affective states, adherence to protective behaviors, trust in health information sources, and resilience. In contrast, increased vaccine hesitancy is associated with a high level of conspiracy-mindedness and trust in media information sources. Recognizing and studying the post-positive reluctance and the phenomenon of free-riding people can help us to become more efficient in combatting the virus.

Who is likely to vacillate in their COVID-19 vaccination decision? Free-riding intention and post-positive reluctance / Caserotti M.; Gavaruzzi T.; Girardi P.; Tasso A.; Buizza C.; Candini V.; Zarbo C.; Chiarotti F.; Brescianini S.; Calamandrei G.; Starace F.; de Girolamo G.; Lotto L.. - In: PREVENTIVE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0091-7435. - STAMPA. - 154:(2022), pp. 106885-106885. [10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106885]

Who is likely to vacillate in their COVID-19 vaccination decision? Free-riding intention and post-positive reluctance

Gavaruzzi T.
Co-primo
;
2022

Abstract

Despite the actual availability of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the pandemic, many people are still vacillating in their decision to vaccinate. In this study, we considered the effect of two relevant contextual issues on vaccination intention: the number of people infected with COVID-19 is increasing, and the pace of vaccination is gaining speed. Specifically, we hypothesized that having already contracted SARS-CoV-2 (post-positive reluctance) could lead people to underestimate the importance of vaccination. Moreover, as the number of vaccinated people increases, more hesitant people could fall into the free-riding intention category, benefitting from the immunity provided by others' vaccinations. Vaccine hesitancy becomes more critical as the vaccination campaign proceeds: at one point, it will be inevitable to deal with hesitant people. This study is part of a WHO Regional Office for Europe project and involved a representative sample of 5006 Italians interviewed in January–February 2021. In case of post-positive reluctance, both young age and female gender increase vaccine hesitancy, while a high level of education reduces free-riding intention. Considering post-positive reluctance and free riding, a protective effect on hesitancy is associated with negative affective states, adherence to protective behaviors, trust in health information sources, and resilience. In contrast, increased vaccine hesitancy is associated with a high level of conspiracy-mindedness and trust in media information sources. Recognizing and studying the post-positive reluctance and the phenomenon of free-riding people can help us to become more efficient in combatting the virus.
2022
Who is likely to vacillate in their COVID-19 vaccination decision? Free-riding intention and post-positive reluctance / Caserotti M.; Gavaruzzi T.; Girardi P.; Tasso A.; Buizza C.; Candini V.; Zarbo C.; Chiarotti F.; Brescianini S.; Calamandrei G.; Starace F.; de Girolamo G.; Lotto L.. - In: PREVENTIVE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0091-7435. - STAMPA. - 154:(2022), pp. 106885-106885. [10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106885]
Caserotti M.; Gavaruzzi T.; Girardi P.; Tasso A.; Buizza C.; Candini V.; Zarbo C.; Chiarotti F.; Brescianini S.; Calamandrei G.; Starace F.; de Girolamo G.; Lotto L.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/901011
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact