We use the suite of Milky Way-like galaxies in the Auriga simulations to determine the contribution to annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in three velocity dependent dark matter annihilation models: Sommerfeld, p-wave, and d-wave models. We compare these to the corresponding distribution in the velocity-independent s-wave annihilation model. For both the hydrodynamical and dark-matter-only simulations, only in the case of the Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation does the total annihilation flux from subhalos exceed the total annihilation flux from the smooth halo component within the virial radius of the halo. Progressing from Sommerfeld to the s, p, and d-wave models, the contribution from the smooth component of the halo becomes more dominant, implying that for the pwave and d-wave models the smooth component is by far the dominant contribution to the radiation. Comparing to the Galactic center excess observed by Fermi-LAT, for all simulated halos the emission is dominated by the smooth halo contribution. However, it is possible that for Sommerfeld models, extrapolation down to mass scales below the current resolution limit of the simulation would imply a non-negligible contribution to the gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center region.

Velocity-dependent annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in cosmological simulations / Erin Piccirillo; Keagan Blanchette; Nassim Bozorgnia; Louis E. Strigari; Carlos S. Frenk; Robert J.J. Grand; Federico Marinacci. - In: JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS. - ISSN 1475-7516. - STAMPA. - 2022:8(2022), pp. 058.1-058.21. [10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/058]

Velocity-dependent annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in cosmological simulations

Federico Marinacci
2022

Abstract

We use the suite of Milky Way-like galaxies in the Auriga simulations to determine the contribution to annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in three velocity dependent dark matter annihilation models: Sommerfeld, p-wave, and d-wave models. We compare these to the corresponding distribution in the velocity-independent s-wave annihilation model. For both the hydrodynamical and dark-matter-only simulations, only in the case of the Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation does the total annihilation flux from subhalos exceed the total annihilation flux from the smooth halo component within the virial radius of the halo. Progressing from Sommerfeld to the s, p, and d-wave models, the contribution from the smooth component of the halo becomes more dominant, implying that for the pwave and d-wave models the smooth component is by far the dominant contribution to the radiation. Comparing to the Galactic center excess observed by Fermi-LAT, for all simulated halos the emission is dominated by the smooth halo contribution. However, it is possible that for Sommerfeld models, extrapolation down to mass scales below the current resolution limit of the simulation would imply a non-negligible contribution to the gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center region.
2022
Velocity-dependent annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in cosmological simulations / Erin Piccirillo; Keagan Blanchette; Nassim Bozorgnia; Louis E. Strigari; Carlos S. Frenk; Robert J.J. Grand; Federico Marinacci. - In: JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS. - ISSN 1475-7516. - STAMPA. - 2022:8(2022), pp. 058.1-058.21. [10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/058]
Erin Piccirillo; Keagan Blanchette; Nassim Bozorgnia; Louis E. Strigari; Carlos S. Frenk; Robert J.J. Grand; Federico Marinacci
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Piccirillo et al. - 2022 - Velocity-dependent annihilation radiation from dar.pdf

Open Access dal 26/08/2023

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 5.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/900646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact