Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of the use of gloves and to assess the prevalence of glove-related symptoms in a sample of Italian dentists with a high occupational exposure to latex gloves. Method and materials: A 31-question instrument was mailed to all dentists (n = 550) practicing in the town of Bologna during 1994 to determine the type of procedures for which gloves were worn by dentists and the prevalence of self-reported glove-related symptoms. Results: Of the dentists who replied to the items (n = 160), 94% reported that they usually wear nonsterile latex examination gloves; and 46% reported that they wear surgical gloves, even if not exclusively. About 98% reported changing gloves after contact with each patient, and 14% reported using disinfectants to treat examination gloves. Of the 106 respondents claiming to use examination gloves for surgical activities, 79 (74%) reported wearing them for extractions. Sterile surgical gloves were reported to be mostly worn for implant placement (47%) and periodontal surgery (42%). There were 46 (29%) responses indicating glove-related problems; of those subjects, 14 (30%) reported having other allergies. Conclusion: The use of gloves is common in the sample of Italian dentists, and the choice between nonsterile examination gloves and sterile surgical gloves seems to be made appropriately.

Use of gloves and prevalence of glove-related reactions in a sample of general dental practitioners in Italy / Checchi L.; Gatto M.R.; Legnani P.; Pelliccioni G.A.; Bisbini P.. - In: QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0033-6572. - STAMPA. - 30:9(1999), pp. 633-636.

Use of gloves and prevalence of glove-related reactions in a sample of general dental practitioners in Italy

Checchi L.
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Gatto M. R.
Secondo
Formal Analysis
;
Legnani P.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Pelliccioni G. A.
Investigation
;
Bisbini P.
Penultimo
Supervision
1999

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of the use of gloves and to assess the prevalence of glove-related symptoms in a sample of Italian dentists with a high occupational exposure to latex gloves. Method and materials: A 31-question instrument was mailed to all dentists (n = 550) practicing in the town of Bologna during 1994 to determine the type of procedures for which gloves were worn by dentists and the prevalence of self-reported glove-related symptoms. Results: Of the dentists who replied to the items (n = 160), 94% reported that they usually wear nonsterile latex examination gloves; and 46% reported that they wear surgical gloves, even if not exclusively. About 98% reported changing gloves after contact with each patient, and 14% reported using disinfectants to treat examination gloves. Of the 106 respondents claiming to use examination gloves for surgical activities, 79 (74%) reported wearing them for extractions. Sterile surgical gloves were reported to be mostly worn for implant placement (47%) and periodontal surgery (42%). There were 46 (29%) responses indicating glove-related problems; of those subjects, 14 (30%) reported having other allergies. Conclusion: The use of gloves is common in the sample of Italian dentists, and the choice between nonsterile examination gloves and sterile surgical gloves seems to be made appropriately.
1999
Use of gloves and prevalence of glove-related reactions in a sample of general dental practitioners in Italy / Checchi L.; Gatto M.R.; Legnani P.; Pelliccioni G.A.; Bisbini P.. - In: QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 0033-6572. - STAMPA. - 30:9(1999), pp. 633-636.
Checchi L.; Gatto M.R.; Legnani P.; Pelliccioni G.A.; Bisbini P.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/897386
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact