The essay analyses the contribution of contemporary analytical metaphysics to social and legal ontology. In particular, the focus is on two authors: Brian Epstein and Jonathan Schaffer. I discuss Epstein’s use of analytical metaphysics notions to explain the structure of social kinds and facts, providing a unique model based on three relations: grounding, anchoring, and framing (GAF). This model offers a new reading of the origin and nature of social entities and brings innovative arguments to the debate in legal ontology. Schaffer’s views represent a competing thesis, which can be included among the so-called conjunctivist theories. Epstein and Schaffer’s analyses converge in some respects and both theories approach social and legal ontology with new, fine-grained tools. However, I defend the epistemic and practical value of Epstein’s model. At the same time, I claim that it would bring more clarity to Epstein’s model if the framing relation was rejected. For this reason, I suggest considering a social reality model relying on the grounding-anchoring diagram alone

Il contributo della metafisica analitica all’ontologia giuridica: Brian Epstein e Jonathan Schaffer / Claudio Novelli. - In: RAGION PRATICA. - ISSN 1720-2396. - ELETTRONICO. - 60:1(2022), pp. 1-25. [10.1415/105063]

Il contributo della metafisica analitica all’ontologia giuridica: Brian Epstein e Jonathan Schaffer

Claudio Novelli
2022

Abstract

The essay analyses the contribution of contemporary analytical metaphysics to social and legal ontology. In particular, the focus is on two authors: Brian Epstein and Jonathan Schaffer. I discuss Epstein’s use of analytical metaphysics notions to explain the structure of social kinds and facts, providing a unique model based on three relations: grounding, anchoring, and framing (GAF). This model offers a new reading of the origin and nature of social entities and brings innovative arguments to the debate in legal ontology. Schaffer’s views represent a competing thesis, which can be included among the so-called conjunctivist theories. Epstein and Schaffer’s analyses converge in some respects and both theories approach social and legal ontology with new, fine-grained tools. However, I defend the epistemic and practical value of Epstein’s model. At the same time, I claim that it would bring more clarity to Epstein’s model if the framing relation was rejected. For this reason, I suggest considering a social reality model relying on the grounding-anchoring diagram alone
2022
Il contributo della metafisica analitica all’ontologia giuridica: Brian Epstein e Jonathan Schaffer / Claudio Novelli. - In: RAGION PRATICA. - ISSN 1720-2396. - ELETTRONICO. - 60:1(2022), pp. 1-25. [10.1415/105063]
Claudio Novelli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ragion Pratica_Contributo Metafisica Analitica.pdf

Open Access dal 16/04/2024

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 961.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
961.3 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/896403
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact