Abstract Background: Several rehabilitative treatments have been proposed for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET). Therapeutic exercise showed the greatest beneficial effects together with patient education, and multimodal treatment subject specific. In recent years, osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been proposed as treatment for LET. The aim of the study was to focus on this emerging approach by comparing it to more traditional physiotherapy. Methods: Thirty-two patients with a diagnosis of LET were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: the OMT group and the physiotherapy group. In the former, patients underwent OMT according to the common techniques. In the latter, patients underwent a physiotherapy protocol consisting in stretching and strengthening exercises, and laser therapy. Outcome measures included the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), the Mayo Elbow Performance, and VAS for pain. Assessment was carried out at baseline (T0), after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. In addition, an ultrasound assessment of the elbow common extensor tendon was performed at T0 and T2. Results: Both the OMT and the Physiotherapy group showed a statistically significant improvement along the follow-up for VAS for pain and PRTEE score. No significant difference was found for the Mayo Score in the Physiotherapy group. Ultrasound assessment confirmed the presence of abnormalities of vascularization, echogenicity, and thickness of the tendon at T0, partially reduced at T2. Conclusion: OMT and physiotherapy resulted both effective in the treatment of LET, offering a significant clinical improvement which helped patients recovering their functional activities in the short-term follow-up.
Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) Vs Physiotherapy in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis
Cappelli Davide;Orlandi Magli Antonella;Spinnato Paolo;Filardo Giuseppe;Tedeschi Roberto;Benedetti Maria Grazia
2022
Abstract
Abstract Background: Several rehabilitative treatments have been proposed for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET). Therapeutic exercise showed the greatest beneficial effects together with patient education, and multimodal treatment subject specific. In recent years, osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been proposed as treatment for LET. The aim of the study was to focus on this emerging approach by comparing it to more traditional physiotherapy. Methods: Thirty-two patients with a diagnosis of LET were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: the OMT group and the physiotherapy group. In the former, patients underwent OMT according to the common techniques. In the latter, patients underwent a physiotherapy protocol consisting in stretching and strengthening exercises, and laser therapy. Outcome measures included the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), the Mayo Elbow Performance, and VAS for pain. Assessment was carried out at baseline (T0), after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. In addition, an ultrasound assessment of the elbow common extensor tendon was performed at T0 and T2. Results: Both the OMT and the Physiotherapy group showed a statistically significant improvement along the follow-up for VAS for pain and PRTEE score. No significant difference was found for the Mayo Score in the Physiotherapy group. Ultrasound assessment confirmed the presence of abnormalities of vascularization, echogenicity, and thickness of the tendon at T0, partially reduced at T2. Conclusion: OMT and physiotherapy resulted both effective in the treatment of LET, offering a significant clinical improvement which helped patients recovering their functional activities in the short-term follow-up.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
