It is not possible to assess the meaning and the impact of the death penalty outside of historical and cultural contexts in which it is applied. An approach, that is also thanatological, seems necessary. In many cases (in ancient, medieval, modern and contemporary history) societies and cultures have been based on taxonomies of values, in which death is not only the worst of evils, but on the contrary is an aspiration. Suicide by proxy, widespread between the 17th and 19th centuries especially in Central and Northern Europe, is a revealing example.
Marco Cavina (2022). Pena di morte e percezioni della morte (Quando la pena non è pena). FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 2(15/09/2022 Paper 2), 11-17.
Pena di morte e percezioni della morte (Quando la pena non è pena)
Marco CavinaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2022
Abstract
It is not possible to assess the meaning and the impact of the death penalty outside of historical and cultural contexts in which it is applied. An approach, that is also thanatological, seems necessary. In many cases (in ancient, medieval, modern and contemporary history) societies and cultures have been based on taxonomies of values, in which death is not only the worst of evils, but on the contrary is an aspiration. Suicide by proxy, widespread between the 17th and 19th centuries especially in Central and Northern Europe, is a revealing example.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Marco Cavina, Pena di morte e percezioni della morte. Quando la pena non è pena..pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
219.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
219.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.