Background: To analyse the evidence supporting the widespread use of modified analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as alternatives to codeine/paracetamol for mild to moderate cancer pain.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was independently performed by two authors. The level of evidence and risk/benefit ratio were assessed in all the selected trials. A comprehensive analysis of the level of evidence, risk/benefit ratio and strength of the recommendations was carried out. The analysis was performed using the GRADE system.Results: Eighteen papers were included into the analysis. The level of evidence was low or very low for all the trials, and as a result the risk/benefit ratio was uncertain. Likewise, the strength of the final recommendations was considered weak negative for either the use of modified analgesic ladders (by-passing the second step of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder) or the use of oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol in the second step of the WHO analgesic ladder.Conclusions: Data supporting the role of modified two-step analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol are insufficient to recommend their routine use in cancer patients with mild to moderate cancer pain. © 2011 The Author(s).

Tassinari D., Drudi F., Rosati M., Tombesi P., Sartori S., Maltoni M. (2011). The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 25(5), 410-423 [10.1177/0269216311405090].

The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review

Maltoni M.
2011

Abstract

Background: To analyse the evidence supporting the widespread use of modified analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as alternatives to codeine/paracetamol for mild to moderate cancer pain.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was independently performed by two authors. The level of evidence and risk/benefit ratio were assessed in all the selected trials. A comprehensive analysis of the level of evidence, risk/benefit ratio and strength of the recommendations was carried out. The analysis was performed using the GRADE system.Results: Eighteen papers were included into the analysis. The level of evidence was low or very low for all the trials, and as a result the risk/benefit ratio was uncertain. Likewise, the strength of the final recommendations was considered weak negative for either the use of modified analgesic ladders (by-passing the second step of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder) or the use of oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol in the second step of the WHO analgesic ladder.Conclusions: Data supporting the role of modified two-step analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol are insufficient to recommend their routine use in cancer patients with mild to moderate cancer pain. © 2011 The Author(s).
2011
Tassinari D., Drudi F., Rosati M., Tombesi P., Sartori S., Maltoni M. (2011). The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 25(5), 410-423 [10.1177/0269216311405090].
Tassinari D.; Drudi F.; Rosati M.; Tombesi P.; Sartori S.; Maltoni M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/890521
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact