Background: To analyse the evidence supporting the widespread use of modified analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as alternatives to codeine/paracetamol for mild to moderate cancer pain.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was independently performed by two authors. The level of evidence and risk/benefit ratio were assessed in all the selected trials. A comprehensive analysis of the level of evidence, risk/benefit ratio and strength of the recommendations was carried out. The analysis was performed using the GRADE system.Results: Eighteen papers were included into the analysis. The level of evidence was low or very low for all the trials, and as a result the risk/benefit ratio was uncertain. Likewise, the strength of the final recommendations was considered weak negative for either the use of modified analgesic ladders (by-passing the second step of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder) or the use of oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol in the second step of the WHO analgesic ladder.Conclusions: Data supporting the role of modified two-step analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol are insufficient to recommend their routine use in cancer patients with mild to moderate cancer pain. © 2011 The Author(s).

The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review / Tassinari D.; Drudi F.; Rosati M.; Tombesi P.; Sartori S.; Maltoni M.. - In: PALLIATIVE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0269-2163. - ELETTRONICO. - 25:5(2011), pp. 410-423. [10.1177/0269216311405090]

The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review

Maltoni M.
2011

Abstract

Background: To analyse the evidence supporting the widespread use of modified analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as alternatives to codeine/paracetamol for mild to moderate cancer pain.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was independently performed by two authors. The level of evidence and risk/benefit ratio were assessed in all the selected trials. A comprehensive analysis of the level of evidence, risk/benefit ratio and strength of the recommendations was carried out. The analysis was performed using the GRADE system.Results: Eighteen papers were included into the analysis. The level of evidence was low or very low for all the trials, and as a result the risk/benefit ratio was uncertain. Likewise, the strength of the final recommendations was considered weak negative for either the use of modified analgesic ladders (by-passing the second step of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder) or the use of oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol in the second step of the WHO analgesic ladder.Conclusions: Data supporting the role of modified two-step analgesic ladders or oral tramadol as an alternative to codeine/paracetamol are insufficient to recommend their routine use in cancer patients with mild to moderate cancer pain. © 2011 The Author(s).
2011
The second step of the analgesic ladder and oral tramadol in the treatment of mild to moderate cancer pain: A systematic review / Tassinari D.; Drudi F.; Rosati M.; Tombesi P.; Sartori S.; Maltoni M.. - In: PALLIATIVE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0269-2163. - ELETTRONICO. - 25:5(2011), pp. 410-423. [10.1177/0269216311405090]
Tassinari D.; Drudi F.; Rosati M.; Tombesi P.; Sartori S.; Maltoni M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/890521
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact