Distance decay 2.0 – A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities

Graco-Roza, C.; Aarnio, S.; Abrego, N.; Acosta, A. T. R.; Alahuhta, J.; Altman, J.; Angiolini, C.; Aroviita, J.; Attorre, F.; Baastrup-Spohr, L.; Barrera-Alba, J. J.; Belmaker, J.; Biurrun, I.; Bonari, G.; Bruelheide, H.; Burrascano, S.; Carboni, M.; Cardoso, P.; Carvalho, J. C.; Castaldelli, G.; Christensen, M.; Correa, G.; Dembicz, I.; Dengler, J.; Dolezal, J.; Domingos, P.; Eros, T.; Ferreira, C. E. L.; Filibeck, G.; Floeter, S. R.; Friedlander, A. M.; Gammal, J.; Gavioli, A.; Gossner, M. M.; Granot, I.; Guarino, R.; Gustafsson, C.; Hayden, B.; He, S.; Heilmann-Clausen, J.; Heino, J.; Hunter, J. T.; Huszar, V. L. M.; Janisova, M.; Jyrkankallio-Mikkola, J.; Kahilainen, K. K.; Kemppinen, J.; Kozub, L.; Kruk, C.; Kulbiki, M.; Kuzemko, A.; Christiaan le Roux, P.; Lehikoinen, A.; Teixeira de Lima, D.; Lopez-Urrutia, A.; Lukacs, B. A.; Luoto, M.; Mammola, S.; Marinho, M. M.; Menezes, L. S.; Milardi, M.; Miranda, M.; Moser, G. A. O.; Mueller, J.; Niittynen, P.; Norkko, A.; Nowak, A.; Ometto, J. P.; Ovaskainen, O.; Overbeck, G. E.; Pacheco, F. S.; Pajunen, V.; Palpurina, S.; Picazo, F.; Prieto, J. A. C.; Rodil, I. F.; Sabatini, F. M.; Salingre, S.; De Sanctis, M.; Segura, A. M.; da Silva, L. H. S.; Stevanovic, Z. D.; Swacha, G.; Teittinen, A.; Tolonen, K. T.; Tsiripidis, I.; Virta, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Weisser, W.; Xu, Y.; Soininen, J.

doi:10.1111/geb.13513

Aim Understanding the variation in community composition and species abundances (i.e., β-diversity) is at the heart of community ecology. A common approach to examine β-diversity is to evaluate directional variation in community composition by measuring the decay in the similarity among pairs of communities along spatial or environmental distance. We provide the first global synthesis of taxonomic and functional distance decay along spatial and environmental distance by analysing 148 datasets comprising different types of organisms and environments. Location Global. Time period 1990 to present. Major taxa studied From diatoms to mammals. Method We measured the strength of the decay using ranked Mantel tests (Mantel r) and the rate of distance decay as the slope of an exponential fit using generalized linear models. We used null models to test whether functional similarity decays faster or slower than expected given the taxonomic decay along the spatial and environmental distance. We also unveiled the factors driving the rate of decay across the datasets, including latitude, spatial extent, realm and organismal features. Results Taxonomic distance decay was stronger than functional distance decay along both spatial and environmental distance. Functional distance decay was random given the taxonomic distance decay. The rate of taxonomic and functional spatial distance decay was fastest in the datasets from mid-latitudes. Overall, datasets covering larger spatial extents showed a lower rate of decay along spatial distance but a higher rate of decay along environmental distance. Marine ecosystems had the slowest rate of decay along environmental distances. Main conclusions In general, taxonomic distance decay is a useful tool for biogeographical research because it reflects dispersal-related factors in addition to species responses to climatic and environmental variables. Moreover, functional distance decay might be a cost-effective option for investigating community changes in heterogeneous environments.

Distance decay 2.0 – A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities / Graco-Roza C.; Aarnio S.; Abrego N.; Acosta A.T.R.; Alahuhta J.; Altman J.; Angiolini C.; Aroviita J.; Attorre F.; Baastrup-Spohr L.; Barrera-Alba J.J.; Belmaker J.; Biurrun I.; Bonari G.; Bruelheide H.; Burrascano S.; Carboni M.; Cardoso P.; Carvalho J.C.; Castaldelli G.; Christensen M.; Correa G.; Dembicz I.; Dengler J.; Dolezal J.; Domingos P.; Eros T.; Ferreira C.E.L.; Filibeck G.; Floeter S.R.; Friedlander A.M.; Gammal J.; Gavioli A.; Gossner M.M.; Granot I.; Guarino R.; Gustafsson C.; Hayden B.; He S.; Heilmann-Clausen J.; Heino J.; Hunter J.T.; Huszar V.L.M.; Janisova M.; Jyrkankallio-Mikkola J.; Kahilainen K.K.; Kemppinen J.; Kozub L.; Kruk C.; Kulbiki M.; Kuzemko A.; Christiaan le Roux P.; Lehikoinen A.; Teixeira de Lima D.; Lopez-Urrutia A.; Lukacs B.A.; Luoto M.; Mammola S.; Marinho M.M.; Menezes L.S.; Milardi M.; Miranda M.; Moser G.A.O.; Mueller J.; Niittynen P.; Norkko A.; Nowak A.; Ometto J.P.; Ovaskainen O.; Overbeck G.E.; Pacheco F.S.; Pajunen V.; Palpurina S.; Picazo F.; Prieto J.A.C.; Rodil I.F.; Sabatini F.M.; Salingre S.; De Sanctis M.; Segura A.M.; da Silva L.H.S.; Stevanovic Z.D.; Swacha G.; Teittinen A.; Tolonen K.T.; Tsiripidis I.; Virta L.; Wang B.; Wang J.; Weisser W.; Xu Y.; Soininen J.. - In: GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY. - ISSN 1466-8238. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:7(2022), pp. 1399-1421. [10.1111/geb.13513]