Jerry Fodor has argued that concepts ought to be public in order to figure in psychological explanations and in accounts of linguistic communication, and that no theory of concepts as structured abilities of categorization can account for publicity. Recently Andy Clark and Jesse Prinz opposed this latter claim, and suggested that the publicity constraint is less demanding than Fodor thinks. In this paper I support Clark and Prinz’s position through disambiguating the publicity constraint, and arguing that linguistic communication enhances concept publicity rather than requiring it.

Lalumera E (2005). Are Concepts Public?. USA : Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Pub..

Are Concepts Public?

Lalumera E
2005

Abstract

Jerry Fodor has argued that concepts ought to be public in order to figure in psychological explanations and in accounts of linguistic communication, and that no theory of concepts as structured abilities of categorization can account for publicity. Recently Andy Clark and Jesse Prinz opposed this latter claim, and suggested that the publicity constraint is less demanding than Fodor thinks. In this paper I support Clark and Prinz’s position through disambiguating the publicity constraint, and arguing that linguistic communication enhances concept publicity rather than requiring it.
2005
Cogsci 2005.
1231
1235
Lalumera E (2005). Are Concepts Public?. USA : Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Pub..
Lalumera E
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/890381
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact