Often I have repeatedly complained about the absence, in any form, of a policy of intervention and coordination of health care systems implemented in different countries. In particular, I recalled the lack, increasingly evident and worrying, of a real interest of the European Union in achieving an objective that for many years had proved important and decisive: that the European Union should also deal with the Public Health of the member countries, with the conviction that only through joint and responsible action it would be possible to face the now inevitable challenges, unfortunately more and more frequent, with greater virulence and breadth in the life of each of us, conditioning its social, economic and cultural development, as the COVID-19 pandemic has shown up. The protection of health is an absolute value, in the awareness that only its full protection is the preliminary reason for any related objective. In the protection of health, and therefore in the primary protection of the individual and the community in which he operates, there can be found the foundations of life, first of all, and of civil life, consequently. Protection requires, however, a strong commitment to cooperation at international level. The action of the individual State is not sufficient and, at the same time, joint action is not sufficient, given that, if the participation of even a single State fails, such non-acceptance can render the efforts useless. That is why the mere constitutional provision is no longer the guarantee for effective protection. It is essential for the international community to share certain general principles and to adhere together to the pursuit of certain objectives which can only find their fundamental conditions in dialogue and mutual collaboration. International organizations, both governmental and non-governmental, will have to work in this direction and the agreed programs, as well as the interventions that will be considered indispensable, will therefore be entrusted to the responsibility of the individual State which, within itself, will have to work accordingly. The speech closest to us concerns, inevitably, the attitude and the role of the European Union, which, essentially, during the COVID-19 pandemic has started the difficult and complex discussion on purely economic interventions, starting with the timely suspension of the Stability Pact. It is true that health is not really a competence matter for the EU Treaties, but it is also true that the most recent Treaties, starting with the Amsterdam Treaty, would have allowed the Union to adopt all the measures aimed at ensuring a high level of protection of human health. In fact, among the areas of cooperation between the Member States, not only diseases and major scourges are mentioned but also, and more generally, all the causes of danger to human health, as well as the fundamental objective of improving Community public health. This is a serious shortcoming, with an essentially political matrix, in the fear that a common health policy could make it difficult to safeguard the sovereignty of individual States. Some fundamental achievements of the Process of Community integration have been disappearing in the whirlwind of the pandemic: the Schengen Treaty suspended almost everywhere, with closure of borders and obvious problems on the subsequent reopening; the European common market, the first major objective of the founding treaties, strongly questioned by the serious internal needs of the individual countries. The public health policy of the European Union has not stopped gaining importance and, although the leading role still falls on the States, it is beginning to discreetly accumulate achievements and advances. At the same time, the voices in public health of the European institutions and agencies are becoming more and more present, some already focused specifically on issues of this order, such as the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control [4]. And this path is still evolving, as it testifies the Regulation (EU) 2021/522 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021–2027, which broadly extends the Union’s competence in the field of health. All this prompts the underlying motivation of this special issue of the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine (JRSM), to account for the important results achieved in this further process of European integration in terms of the right to health protection.

carlo bottari (2022). Introduction to the special issue on the G20 Rome Declaration at the Global Health Summit in Rome on 21 May 2021. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE, 33(2), 91-94 [10.3233/JRS-227000].

Introduction to the special issue on the G20 Rome Declaration at the Global Health Summit in Rome on 21 May 2021

carlo bottari
2022

Abstract

Often I have repeatedly complained about the absence, in any form, of a policy of intervention and coordination of health care systems implemented in different countries. In particular, I recalled the lack, increasingly evident and worrying, of a real interest of the European Union in achieving an objective that for many years had proved important and decisive: that the European Union should also deal with the Public Health of the member countries, with the conviction that only through joint and responsible action it would be possible to face the now inevitable challenges, unfortunately more and more frequent, with greater virulence and breadth in the life of each of us, conditioning its social, economic and cultural development, as the COVID-19 pandemic has shown up. The protection of health is an absolute value, in the awareness that only its full protection is the preliminary reason for any related objective. In the protection of health, and therefore in the primary protection of the individual and the community in which he operates, there can be found the foundations of life, first of all, and of civil life, consequently. Protection requires, however, a strong commitment to cooperation at international level. The action of the individual State is not sufficient and, at the same time, joint action is not sufficient, given that, if the participation of even a single State fails, such non-acceptance can render the efforts useless. That is why the mere constitutional provision is no longer the guarantee for effective protection. It is essential for the international community to share certain general principles and to adhere together to the pursuit of certain objectives which can only find their fundamental conditions in dialogue and mutual collaboration. International organizations, both governmental and non-governmental, will have to work in this direction and the agreed programs, as well as the interventions that will be considered indispensable, will therefore be entrusted to the responsibility of the individual State which, within itself, will have to work accordingly. The speech closest to us concerns, inevitably, the attitude and the role of the European Union, which, essentially, during the COVID-19 pandemic has started the difficult and complex discussion on purely economic interventions, starting with the timely suspension of the Stability Pact. It is true that health is not really a competence matter for the EU Treaties, but it is also true that the most recent Treaties, starting with the Amsterdam Treaty, would have allowed the Union to adopt all the measures aimed at ensuring a high level of protection of human health. In fact, among the areas of cooperation between the Member States, not only diseases and major scourges are mentioned but also, and more generally, all the causes of danger to human health, as well as the fundamental objective of improving Community public health. This is a serious shortcoming, with an essentially political matrix, in the fear that a common health policy could make it difficult to safeguard the sovereignty of individual States. Some fundamental achievements of the Process of Community integration have been disappearing in the whirlwind of the pandemic: the Schengen Treaty suspended almost everywhere, with closure of borders and obvious problems on the subsequent reopening; the European common market, the first major objective of the founding treaties, strongly questioned by the serious internal needs of the individual countries. The public health policy of the European Union has not stopped gaining importance and, although the leading role still falls on the States, it is beginning to discreetly accumulate achievements and advances. At the same time, the voices in public health of the European institutions and agencies are becoming more and more present, some already focused specifically on issues of this order, such as the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control [4]. And this path is still evolving, as it testifies the Regulation (EU) 2021/522 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021–2027, which broadly extends the Union’s competence in the field of health. All this prompts the underlying motivation of this special issue of the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine (JRSM), to account for the important results achieved in this further process of European integration in terms of the right to health protection.
2022
carlo bottari (2022). Introduction to the special issue on the G20 Rome Declaration at the Global Health Summit in Rome on 21 May 2021. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE, 33(2), 91-94 [10.3233/JRS-227000].
carlo bottari
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/884923
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact