: Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) is a well-established treatment for neoplasia of the proximal femur. The use of this surgical technique for non-neoplastic conditions has increased over the years. We carried out a systematic review of the literature to study the indications, complications, and functional results when PFR is used for non-neoplastic conditions. Twenty-seven studies were included in the review with a total of 828 PFRs with a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 1-225 months). The main indications were infection (28%), periprosthetic fracture (27%), aseptic loosening (22%), and fracture (16%). The rate of reoperation was 20.3% overall. The overall revision rate was 15.4%. The main complications were dislocation (10.2%) and infection (7.3%). After 2010, the rates of reoperation (25.5% versus 18.2%), loosening (9.4% versus 3.2%), and dislocation (15.7% versus 7.9%) were lower than before 2010. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%. The hip function scores improved post-surgery. In conclusion, the use of PFR in non-neoplastic conditions remains a marginal tool, associated with low direct mortality and high complication rates, but we expect its use to increase in the near future.

Di Martino, A., Pederiva, D., Bordini, B., Di Carlo, G., Panciera, A., Geraci, G., et al. (2022). Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 23(1), 18-30 [10.1186/s10195-022-00632-z].

Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes

Di Martino, Alberto
;
Pederiva, Davide;Di Carlo, Gabriele;Panciera, Alessandro;Geraci, Giuseppe;Stefanini, Niccolò;Faldini, Cesare
2022

Abstract

: Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) is a well-established treatment for neoplasia of the proximal femur. The use of this surgical technique for non-neoplastic conditions has increased over the years. We carried out a systematic review of the literature to study the indications, complications, and functional results when PFR is used for non-neoplastic conditions. Twenty-seven studies were included in the review with a total of 828 PFRs with a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 1-225 months). The main indications were infection (28%), periprosthetic fracture (27%), aseptic loosening (22%), and fracture (16%). The rate of reoperation was 20.3% overall. The overall revision rate was 15.4%. The main complications were dislocation (10.2%) and infection (7.3%). After 2010, the rates of reoperation (25.5% versus 18.2%), loosening (9.4% versus 3.2%), and dislocation (15.7% versus 7.9%) were lower than before 2010. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%. The hip function scores improved post-surgery. In conclusion, the use of PFR in non-neoplastic conditions remains a marginal tool, associated with low direct mortality and high complication rates, but we expect its use to increase in the near future.
2022
Di Martino, A., Pederiva, D., Bordini, B., Di Carlo, G., Panciera, A., Geraci, G., et al. (2022). Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 23(1), 18-30 [10.1186/s10195-022-00632-z].
Di Martino, Alberto; Pederiva, Davide; Bordini, Barbara; Di Carlo, Gabriele; Panciera, Alessandro; Geraci, Giuseppe; Stefanini, Niccolò; Faldini, Cesa...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pfr.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 3.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.19 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/880861
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact