Molybdenum sulfide (MoS2 ) has emerged as a promising catalyst for hydrogen evolution applications. The synthesis method mainly employed is a conventional hydrothermal method. This method requires a longer time compared to other methods such as microwave synthesis methods. There is a lack of comparison of the two synthesis methods in terms of crystal morphology and its electrochemical activities. In this work, MoS2 nanosheets are synthesized using both hydrothermal (HT-MoS2 ) and advanced microwave methods (MW-MoS2 ), their crystal morphology, and catalytical efficiency towards hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) were compared. MoS2 nanosheet is obtained using microwave-assisted synthesis in a very short time (30 min) compared to the 24 h hydrothermal synthesis method. Both methods produce thin and aggregated nanosheets. However, the nanosheets synthesized by the microwave method have a less crumpled structure and smoother edges compared to the hydrothermal method. The as-prepared nanosheets are tested and used as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution results in nearly similar electrocatalytic performance. Experimental results showed that: HT-MoS2 displays a current density of 10 mA/cm2 at overpotential (−280 mV) compared to MW-MoS2 which requires −320 mV to produce a similar current density, suggesting that the HT-MoS2 more active towards hydrogen evolutions reaction.

Solomon G., Mazzaro R., Morandi V., Concina I., Vomiero A. (2020). Microwave-assisted vs. Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of mos2 nanosheets: Application towards hydrogen evolution reaction. CRYSTALS, 10(11), 1-12 [10.3390/cryst10111040].

Microwave-assisted vs. Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of mos2 nanosheets: Application towards hydrogen evolution reaction

Mazzaro R.;Morandi V.;
2020

Abstract

Molybdenum sulfide (MoS2 ) has emerged as a promising catalyst for hydrogen evolution applications. The synthesis method mainly employed is a conventional hydrothermal method. This method requires a longer time compared to other methods such as microwave synthesis methods. There is a lack of comparison of the two synthesis methods in terms of crystal morphology and its electrochemical activities. In this work, MoS2 nanosheets are synthesized using both hydrothermal (HT-MoS2 ) and advanced microwave methods (MW-MoS2 ), their crystal morphology, and catalytical efficiency towards hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) were compared. MoS2 nanosheet is obtained using microwave-assisted synthesis in a very short time (30 min) compared to the 24 h hydrothermal synthesis method. Both methods produce thin and aggregated nanosheets. However, the nanosheets synthesized by the microwave method have a less crumpled structure and smoother edges compared to the hydrothermal method. The as-prepared nanosheets are tested and used as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution results in nearly similar electrocatalytic performance. Experimental results showed that: HT-MoS2 displays a current density of 10 mA/cm2 at overpotential (−280 mV) compared to MW-MoS2 which requires −320 mV to produce a similar current density, suggesting that the HT-MoS2 more active towards hydrogen evolutions reaction.
2020
Solomon G., Mazzaro R., Morandi V., Concina I., Vomiero A. (2020). Microwave-assisted vs. Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of mos2 nanosheets: Application towards hydrogen evolution reaction. CRYSTALS, 10(11), 1-12 [10.3390/cryst10111040].
Solomon G.; Mazzaro R.; Morandi V.; Concina I.; Vomiero A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Solomon et al. - 2020 - Microwave-Assisted vs. Conventional Hydrothermal Synthesis of MoS2 Nanosheets Application towards Hydrogen Evolu.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 3.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/879484
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact