Composites made of fibers embedded in organic or inorganic matrices are efficient systems for reinforcing historical masonry structures to provide strength and ductility with a negligible mass increment. As it is well known, the structural performance of the composites mainly relies on their adhesion to the substrate. There are different methods to test the adhesion of the composite to the substrate: in laboratory direct shear test is the most commonly employed, while on-site the bond between the reinforcement and the substrate is checked by the pull-off test. In this paper, the adhesion of different composites to the same substrate made of fired-clay bricks is investigated by both the shear test and the pull-off test to qualitatively assess the difference in the two methods. Additionally, to investigate whether the bond is affected by the presence of water in the pores, half of the specimens were tested in water saturated conditions. Three different types of matrix (based on epoxy resin, natural hydraulic lime and Portland cement) were used for the composite matrix, without changing the geometry, the type of masonry substrate and the fibers (galvanized steel cords).

Characterization of FRCM- and FRP-Masonry Bond Behavior

Cristina Gentilini
Primo
;
Christian Carloni
Secondo
;
Elisa Franzoni
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Composites made of fibers embedded in organic or inorganic matrices are efficient systems for reinforcing historical masonry structures to provide strength and ductility with a negligible mass increment. As it is well known, the structural performance of the composites mainly relies on their adhesion to the substrate. There are different methods to test the adhesion of the composite to the substrate: in laboratory direct shear test is the most commonly employed, while on-site the bond between the reinforcement and the substrate is checked by the pull-off test. In this paper, the adhesion of different composites to the same substrate made of fired-clay bricks is investigated by both the shear test and the pull-off test to qualitatively assess the difference in the two methods. Additionally, to investigate whether the bond is affected by the presence of water in the pores, half of the specimens were tested in water saturated conditions. Three different types of matrix (based on epoxy resin, natural hydraulic lime and Portland cement) were used for the composite matrix, without changing the geometry, the type of masonry substrate and the fibers (galvanized steel cords).
Proceedings XII International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions – SAHC
2451
2457
Cristina Gentilini, Christian Carloni, Roberta Santoro, Elisa Franzoni
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/873279
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact