Objective: Evaluate the performance of a robotic system for CT-guided lung biopsy in comparison to the conventional manual technique.Materials and methods: One hundred patients referred for CT-guided lung biopsy were randomly assigned to group A (robot-assisted procedure) or group B (conventional procedure). Size, distance from entry point and position in lung of target lesions were evaluated to assess homogeneity differences between the two groups. Procedure duration, dose length product (DLP), precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were evaluated to assess the clinical performance of the robotic system as compared to the conventional technique.Results: All biopsies were successfully performed. The size (p = 0.41), distance from entry point (p = 0.86) and position in lung (p = 0.32) of target lesions were similar in both groups (p = 0.05). Procedure duration and radiation dose were significantly reduced in group A as compared to group B (p = 0.001). Precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were similar in both groups (p = 0.05).Conclusion: Robot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy can be performed safely and with high diagnostic accuracy, reducing procedure duration and radiation dose in comparison to the conventional manual technique.Key Points: • CT-guided biopsy is the main procedure to obtain diagnosis in lung tumours.• The robotic device facilitates percutaneous needle placement under CT guidance.• Robot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy reduces procedure duration and radiation dose.
Anzidei M., Argiro R., Porfiri A., Boni F., Anile M., Zaccagna F., et al. (2015). Preliminary clinical experience with a dedicated interventional robotic system for CT-guided biopsies of lung lesions: a comparison with the conventional manual technique. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 25(5), 1310-1316 [10.1007/s00330-014-3508-z].
Preliminary clinical experience with a dedicated interventional robotic system for CT-guided biopsies of lung lesions: a comparison with the conventional manual technique
Zaccagna F.;
2015
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the performance of a robotic system for CT-guided lung biopsy in comparison to the conventional manual technique.Materials and methods: One hundred patients referred for CT-guided lung biopsy were randomly assigned to group A (robot-assisted procedure) or group B (conventional procedure). Size, distance from entry point and position in lung of target lesions were evaluated to assess homogeneity differences between the two groups. Procedure duration, dose length product (DLP), precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were evaluated to assess the clinical performance of the robotic system as compared to the conventional technique.Results: All biopsies were successfully performed. The size (p = 0.41), distance from entry point (p = 0.86) and position in lung (p = 0.32) of target lesions were similar in both groups (p = 0.05). Procedure duration and radiation dose were significantly reduced in group A as compared to group B (p = 0.001). Precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were similar in both groups (p = 0.05).Conclusion: Robot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy can be performed safely and with high diagnostic accuracy, reducing procedure duration and radiation dose in comparison to the conventional manual technique.Key Points: • CT-guided biopsy is the main procedure to obtain diagnosis in lung tumours.• The robotic device facilitates percutaneous needle placement under CT guidance.• Robot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy reduces procedure duration and radiation dose.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
