Background: The role of allium vegetables on gastric cancer (GC) risk remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated whether higher intakes of allium vegetables reduce GC risk using individual participant data from 17 studies participating in the "Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project", including 6097 GC cases and 13,017 controls. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a two-stage modelling approach. Results: Total allium vegetables intake was inversely associated with GC risk. The pooled OR for the highest versus the lowest study-specific tertile of consumption was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.56-0.90), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2 > 50%). Pooled ORs for high versus low consumption were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) for onions and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93) for garlic. The inverse association with allium vegetables was evident in Asian (OR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29-0.86) but not European (OR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.81-1.13) and American (OR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.39-1.11) studies. Results were consistent across all other strata. Conclusions: In a worldwide consortium of epidemiological studies, we found an inverse association between allium vegetables and GC, with a stronger association seen in Asian studies. The heterogeneity of results across geographic regions and possible residual confounding suggest caution in results interpretation.

Allium vegetables intake and the risk of gastric cancer in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project

Boffetta, Paolo;Negri, Eva;
2022

Abstract

Background: The role of allium vegetables on gastric cancer (GC) risk remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated whether higher intakes of allium vegetables reduce GC risk using individual participant data from 17 studies participating in the "Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project", including 6097 GC cases and 13,017 controls. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a two-stage modelling approach. Results: Total allium vegetables intake was inversely associated with GC risk. The pooled OR for the highest versus the lowest study-specific tertile of consumption was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.56-0.90), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2 > 50%). Pooled ORs for high versus low consumption were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) for onions and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93) for garlic. The inverse association with allium vegetables was evident in Asian (OR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29-0.86) but not European (OR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.81-1.13) and American (OR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.39-1.11) studies. Results were consistent across all other strata. Conclusions: In a worldwide consortium of epidemiological studies, we found an inverse association between allium vegetables and GC, with a stronger association seen in Asian studies. The heterogeneity of results across geographic regions and possible residual confounding suggest caution in results interpretation.
2022
Dalmartello, Michela; Turati, Federica; Zhang, Zuo-Feng; Lunet, Nuno; Rota, Matteo; Bonzi, Rossella; Galeone, Carlotta; Martimianaki, Georgia; Palli, Domenico; Ferraroni, Monica; Yu, Guo-Pei; Morais, Samantha; Malekzadeh, Reza; López-Carrillo, Lizbeth; Zaridze, David; Maximovitch, Dmitry; Aragonés, Nuria; Fernández-Tardón, Guillermo; Martin, Vicente; Vioque, Jesus; Garcia de la Hera, Manoli; Curado, Maria Paula; Coimbra, Felipe Jose Fernandez; Assumpcao, Paulo; Pakseresht, Mohammadreza; Hu, Jinfu; Hernández-Ramírez, Raúl Ulises; Ward, Mary H; Pourfarzi, Farhad; Mu, Lina; Tsugane, Shoichiro; Hidaka, Akihisa; Lagiou, Pagona; Lagiou, Areti; Trichopoulou, Antonia; Karakatsani, Anna; Boffetta, Paolo; Camargo, M Costanza; Negri, Eva; La Vecchia, Carlo; Pelucchi, Claudio
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/870004
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact