This study assesses the association between salt added atthe table, processed meat and the risk of various cancers. Mailed questionnaires were completed by 19 732patients with histologically confirmed incident cancer of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, breast, ovary, prostate, testis, kidney, bladder, brain, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or leukaemia, and 5039 population controls,between 1994 and 1997. Measurement included information on socioeconomic status, lifestyle habits and diet. A 69-item food frequency questionnaire provided dataon eating habits 2 years before the study. Odds ratiosand 95% confidence intervals were derived through unconditional logistic regression. Compared with never adding salt at the table, always or often adding salt at the table was associated with an increased risk of stomach, lung, testicular and bladder cancer. Processed meat was significantly related to the risk of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, prostate, testis, kidney and bladdercancer and leukaemia; the odds ratios for the highest quartile ranged from 1.3 to 1.7. The findings addtothe evidence that high consumption of salt and processed meat may play a role in the aetiology of several cancers.

Salt, processed meat and the risk of cancer / J. Hu; C. La Vecchia; H. Morrison; E. Negri; L. Mery; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION. - ISSN 0959-8278. - 20:2(2011), pp. 132-139. [10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283429e32]

Salt, processed meat and the risk of cancer

E. Negri;
2011

Abstract

This study assesses the association between salt added atthe table, processed meat and the risk of various cancers. Mailed questionnaires were completed by 19 732patients with histologically confirmed incident cancer of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, breast, ovary, prostate, testis, kidney, bladder, brain, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or leukaemia, and 5039 population controls,between 1994 and 1997. Measurement included information on socioeconomic status, lifestyle habits and diet. A 69-item food frequency questionnaire provided dataon eating habits 2 years before the study. Odds ratiosand 95% confidence intervals were derived through unconditional logistic regression. Compared with never adding salt at the table, always or often adding salt at the table was associated with an increased risk of stomach, lung, testicular and bladder cancer. Processed meat was significantly related to the risk of the stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, prostate, testis, kidney and bladdercancer and leukaemia; the odds ratios for the highest quartile ranged from 1.3 to 1.7. The findings addtothe evidence that high consumption of salt and processed meat may play a role in the aetiology of several cancers.
2011
Salt, processed meat and the risk of cancer / J. Hu; C. La Vecchia; H. Morrison; E. Negri; L. Mery; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION. - ISSN 0959-8278. - 20:2(2011), pp. 132-139. [10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283429e32]
J. Hu; C. La Vecchia; H. Morrison; E. Negri; L. Mery; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/866578
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 27
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact