Background: To evaluate the distal landing zone (LZ) outcomes in adverse morphology after thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with distal active fixation (DAF) stent-grafts compared with standard endografts. Methods: Between 2006 and the 31st December 2020, sixty-nine DAFs (study group) and sixty-nine standard stent-grafts (control group) were enrolled in a multi-center, retrospective, case-control study. The primary outcomes were the distal endoleak and reintervention. The secondary outcomes were: distal segment migration, wedge apposition and related complications. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression followed by a propensity-scored model (1:1) were performed. Results: The results were reported for the DAF vs. control group. The mean follow-up was 3.3±2.1 vs. 3.7±3.4 years. The distal endoleak rate was 7.3% vs. 27.5% (P=0.011). The freedom from distal endoleak was 95%, 95% and 91% vs. 85%, 76%, and 73% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively (Log-rank P=0.011). Tortuosity index and distal thoracic aorta angulation were predictors of endoleak (P=0.012 and P=0.029 respectively). The distal reinterventions rate was 7.3% vs. 20.3% (P=0.026). The freedom from distal reinterventions was 95%, 95% and 91% vs. 92%, 75% and 75% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively (Log-rank P=0.041). The wedge apposition was 5.8 vs. 13.0-mm (P<0.000). The distal segment migration was upward directed in all cases and was significant (>10-mm) in 13.0% vs. 39.1% (P=0.000). Conclusions: The DAF stent-graft showed a significant reduction of the distal endoleak rates and other specific outcomes of the distal LZ in patients with an adverse anatomy.

Distal landing zone outcomes in thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with challenging morphology: a propensity-matched comparison of distal active fixation versus standard stent-graft

Leone, Nicola
Secondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2022

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the distal landing zone (LZ) outcomes in adverse morphology after thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with distal active fixation (DAF) stent-grafts compared with standard endografts. Methods: Between 2006 and the 31st December 2020, sixty-nine DAFs (study group) and sixty-nine standard stent-grafts (control group) were enrolled in a multi-center, retrospective, case-control study. The primary outcomes were the distal endoleak and reintervention. The secondary outcomes were: distal segment migration, wedge apposition and related complications. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression followed by a propensity-scored model (1:1) were performed. Results: The results were reported for the DAF vs. control group. The mean follow-up was 3.3±2.1 vs. 3.7±3.4 years. The distal endoleak rate was 7.3% vs. 27.5% (P=0.011). The freedom from distal endoleak was 95%, 95% and 91% vs. 85%, 76%, and 73% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively (Log-rank P=0.011). Tortuosity index and distal thoracic aorta angulation were predictors of endoleak (P=0.012 and P=0.029 respectively). The distal reinterventions rate was 7.3% vs. 20.3% (P=0.026). The freedom from distal reinterventions was 95%, 95% and 91% vs. 92%, 75% and 75% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively (Log-rank P=0.041). The wedge apposition was 5.8 vs. 13.0-mm (P<0.000). The distal segment migration was upward directed in all cases and was significant (>10-mm) in 13.0% vs. 39.1% (P=0.000). Conclusions: The DAF stent-graft showed a significant reduction of the distal endoleak rates and other specific outcomes of the distal LZ in patients with an adverse anatomy.
2022
Gennai, Stefano; Leone, Nicola; Karelis, Angelos; Xodo, Andrea; Mezzetto, Luca; Fargion, Aaron; Antonello, Michele; Veraldi, Gian F; Dias, Nuno V; Sonesson, Björn; Pratesi, Carlo; Silingardi, Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/864780
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact