Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
We present the implications for cosmic inflation of the Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies in both temperature and polarization based on the full Planck survey, which includes more than twice the integration time of the nominal survey used for the 2013 release papers. The Planck full mission temperature data and a first release of polarization data on large angular scales measure the spectral index of curvature perturbations to be ns = 0.968 ± 0.006 and tightly constrain its scale dependence to dns/dlnk =-0.003 ± 0.007 when combined with the Planck lensing likelihood. When the Planck high-â"" polarization data are included, the results are consistent and uncertainties are further reduced. The upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio is r0.002< 0.11 (95% CL). This upper limit is consistent with the B-mode polarization constraint r< 0.12 (95% CL) obtained from a joint analysis of the BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck data. These results imply that V(φ) â φ2 and natural inflation are now disfavoured compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio, such as R2 inflation. We search for several physically motivated deviations from a simple power-law spectrum of curvature perturbations, including those motivated by a reconstruction of the inflaton potential not relying on the slow-roll approximation. We find that such models are not preferred, either according to a Bayesian model comparison or according to a frequentist simulation-based analysis. Three independent methods reconstructing the primordial power spectrum consistently recover a featureless and smooth hbox$cal P-calR(k)$ over the range of scales 0.008 Mpc-1 â‰2 k â‰2 0.1 Mpc-1. At large scales, each method finds deviations from a power law, connected to a deficit at multipoles â"" ≠20-40 in the temperature power spectrum, but at an uncompelling statistical significance owing to the large cosmic variance present at these multipoles. By combining power spectrum and non-Gaussianity bounds, we constrain models with generalized Lagrangians, including Galileon models and axion monodromy models. The Planck data are consistent with adiabatic primordial perturbations, and the estimated values for the parameters of the base Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model are not significantly altered when more general initial conditions are admitted. In correlated mixed adiabatic and isocurvature models, the 95% CL upper bound for the non-adiabatic contribution to the observed CMB temperature variance is | αnon-adi | < 1.9%, 4.0%, and 2.9% for CDM, neutrino density, and neutrino velocity isocurvature modes, respectively. We have tested inflationary models producing an anisotropic modulation of the primordial curvature power spectrum findingthat the dipolar modulation in the CMB temperature field induced by a CDM isocurvature perturbation is not preferred at a statistically significant level. We also establish tight constraints on a possible quadrupolar modulation of the curvature perturbation. These results are consistent with the Planck 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data and further constrain slow-roll single-field inflationary models, as expected from the increased precision of Planck data using the full set of observations.
Ade, P. A. R.;Aghanim, N.;Arnaud, M.;Arroja, F.;Ashdown, M.;Aumont, J.;BACCIGALUPI, CARLO;BALLARDINI, MARIO;Banday, A. J.;Barreiro, R. B.;Bartolo, N.;Battaner, E.;Benabed, K.;Benoît, A.;Benoit Lévy, A.;Bernard, J. P.;BERSANELLI, MATTEO;Bielewicz, P.;Bock, J. J.;Bonaldi, A.;Bonavera, L.;Bond, J. R.;Borrill, J.;Bouchet, F. R.;Boulanger, F.;Bucher, M.;Burigana, C.;Butler, R. C.;CALABRESE, ERICA;Cardoso, J. F.;Catalano, A.;Challinor, A.;Chamballu, A.;Chary, R. R.;Chiang, H. C.;Christensen, P. R.;Church, S.;Clements, D. L.;Colombi, S.;Colombo, L. P. L.;Combet, C.;Contreras, D.;Couchot, F.;Coulais, A.;Crill, B. P.;Curto, A.;CUTTAIA, FRANCESCO;Danese, L.;Davies, R. D.;Davis, R. J.;De Bernardis, P.;De Rosa, A.;De Zotti, G.;Delabrouille, J.;Désert, F. X.;Diego, J. M.;Dole, H.;Donzelli, S.;Doré, O.;Douspis, M.;Ducout, A.;Dupac, X.;Efstathiou, G.;Elsner, F.;Enßlin, T. A.;Eriksen, H. K.;Fergusson, J.;FINELLI, FABIO;Forni, O.;Frailis, M.;Fraisse, A. A.;FRANCESCHI, ENRICO;Frejsel, A.;Frolov, A.;Galeotta, S.;Galli, S.;Ganga, K.;Gauthier, C.;Giard, M.;Giraud Héraud, Y.;Gjerløw, E.;González Nuevo, J.;Górski, K. M.;Gratton, S.;Gregorio, A.;GRUPPUSO, ALESSANDRO;Gudmundsson, J. E.;Hamann, J.;Handley, W.;Hansen, F. K.;Hanson, D.;Harrison, D. L.;Henrot Versillé, S.;Hernández Monteagudo, C.;Herranz, D.;Hildebrandt, S. R.;Hivon, E.;Hobson, M.;Holmes, W. A.;Hornstrup, A.;Hovest, W.;HUANG, ZIANG;Huffenberger, K. M.;Hurier, G.;Jaffe, A. H.;Jaffe, T. R.;Jones, W. C.;Juvela, M.;Keihänen, E.;Keskitalo, R.;KIM, JEONGYOUN;Kisner, T. S.;Kneissl, R.;Knoche, J.;Kunz, M.;Kurki Suonio, H.;Lagache, G.;Lähteenmäki, A.;Lamarre, J. M.;Lasenby, A.;Lattanzi, M.;Lawrence, C. R.;LEONARDI, RENZO;Lesgourgues, J.;Levrier, F.;Lewis, A.;Liguori, M.;Lilje, P. B.;Linden Vørnle, M.;López Caniego, M.;Lubin, P. M.;Ma, Y. Z.;Maciás Pérez, J. F.;Maggio, G.;MAINO, DAVIDE;Mandolesi, N.;Mangilli, A.;Maris, M.;Martin, P. G.;Martínez González, E.;MASI, SILVIA;MATARRESE, SABINO;Mcgehee, P.;Meinhold, P. R.;MELCHIORRI, ALESSIA;Mendes, L.;MENNELLA, ALESSIO;Migliaccio, M.;Mitra, S.;Miville Deschênes, M. A.;MOLINARI, DIEGO;Moneti, A.;Montier, L.;Morgante, G.;Mortlock, D.;Moss, A.;Münchmeyer, M.;Munshi, D.;Murphy, J. A.;Naselsky, P.;Nati, F.;Natoli, P.;Netterfield, C. B.;Nørgaard Nielsen, H. U.;NOVIELLO, FEDERICA;Novikov, D.;Novikov, I.;Oxborrow, C. A.;PACI, FRANCESCO;Pagano, L.;Pajot, F.;Paladini, R.;Pandolfi, S.;Paoletti, D.;Pasian, F.;Patanchon, G.;Pearson, T. J.;Peiris, H. V.;Perdereau, O.;Perotto, L.;PERROTTA, FABIO;Pettorino, V.;PIACENTINI, FEDERICO;Piat, M.;PIERPAOLI, EMANUELE;Pietrobon, D.;Plaszczynski, S.;Pointecouteau, E.;Polenta, G.;Popa, L.;Pratt, G. W.;Prézeau, G.;Prunet, S.;Puget, J. L.;Rachen, J. P.;Reach, W. T.;Rebolo, R.;Reinecke, M.;Remazeilles, M.;Renault, C.;RENZI, ANDREA;Ristorcelli, I.;Rocha, G.;Rosset, C.;Rossetti, M.;Roudier, G.;ROWAN-ROBINSON, GEOFFREY MICHAEL;Rubinõ Martín, J. A.;Rusholme, B.;Sandri, M.;Santos, D.;Savelainen, M.;Savini, G.;Scott, D.;Seiffert, M. D.;Shellard, E. P. S.;Shiraishi, M.;Spencer, L. D.;Stolyarov, V.;Stompor, R.;Sudiwala, R.;Sunyaev, R.;Sutton, D.;Suur Uski, A. S.;Sygnet, J. F.;Tauber, J. A.;TERENZI, LAURA;Toffolatti, L.;Tomasi, M.;Tristram, M.;TROMBETTI, TIZIANA;Tucci, M.;Tuovinen, J.;Valenziano, L.;Valiviita, J.;Van Tent, B.;Vielva, P.;Villa, F.;Wade, L. A.;Wandelt, B. D.;Wehus, I. K.;White, M.;Yvon, D.;Zacchei, A.;Zibin, J. P.;Zonca, A.
2016
Abstract
We present the implications for cosmic inflation of the Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies in both temperature and polarization based on the full Planck survey, which includes more than twice the integration time of the nominal survey used for the 2013 release papers. The Planck full mission temperature data and a first release of polarization data on large angular scales measure the spectral index of curvature perturbations to be ns = 0.968 ± 0.006 and tightly constrain its scale dependence to dns/dlnk =-0.003 ± 0.007 when combined with the Planck lensing likelihood. When the Planck high-â"" polarization data are included, the results are consistent and uncertainties are further reduced. The upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio is r0.002< 0.11 (95% CL). This upper limit is consistent with the B-mode polarization constraint r< 0.12 (95% CL) obtained from a joint analysis of the BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck data. These results imply that V(φ) â φ2 and natural inflation are now disfavoured compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio, such as R2 inflation. We search for several physically motivated deviations from a simple power-law spectrum of curvature perturbations, including those motivated by a reconstruction of the inflaton potential not relying on the slow-roll approximation. We find that such models are not preferred, either according to a Bayesian model comparison or according to a frequentist simulation-based analysis. Three independent methods reconstructing the primordial power spectrum consistently recover a featureless and smooth hbox$cal P-calR(k)$ over the range of scales 0.008 Mpc-1 â‰2 k â‰2 0.1 Mpc-1. At large scales, each method finds deviations from a power law, connected to a deficit at multipoles â"" ≠20-40 in the temperature power spectrum, but at an uncompelling statistical significance owing to the large cosmic variance present at these multipoles. By combining power spectrum and non-Gaussianity bounds, we constrain models with generalized Lagrangians, including Galileon models and axion monodromy models. The Planck data are consistent with adiabatic primordial perturbations, and the estimated values for the parameters of the base Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model are not significantly altered when more general initial conditions are admitted. In correlated mixed adiabatic and isocurvature models, the 95% CL upper bound for the non-adiabatic contribution to the observed CMB temperature variance is | αnon-adi | < 1.9%, 4.0%, and 2.9% for CDM, neutrino density, and neutrino velocity isocurvature modes, respectively. We have tested inflationary models producing an anisotropic modulation of the primordial curvature power spectrum findingthat the dipolar modulation in the CMB temperature field induced by a CDM isocurvature perturbation is not preferred at a statistically significant level. We also establish tight constraints on a possible quadrupolar modulation of the curvature perturbation. These results are consistent with the Planck 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data and further constrain slow-roll single-field inflationary models, as expected from the increased precision of Planck data using the full set of observations.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/863566
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
1293
738
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.