Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers' preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: 'monetary' (7 attributes), 'general' (4 attributes), 'flexibility' (6 attributes), `prescription' (12 attributes), and 'purpose' (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers' choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers' participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.
Raina, N., Zavalloni, M., Targetti, S., D'Alberto, R., Raggi, M., Viaggi, D. (2021). A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts. BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 10(2), 137-152 [10.36253/bae-9678].
A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts
Raina, N
Primo
;Zavalloni, M;Targetti, S;D'Alberto, R;Raggi, M;Viaggi, D
2021
Abstract
Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers' preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: 'monetary' (7 attributes), 'general' (4 attributes), 'flexibility' (6 attributes), `prescription' (12 attributes), and 'purpose' (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers' choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers' participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
9678-Article Text-32746-1-10-20211028 (4).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
480.92 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
480.92 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.