Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers' preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: 'monetary' (7 attributes), 'general' (4 attributes), 'flexibility' (6 attributes), `prescription' (12 attributes), and 'purpose' (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers' choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers' participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.

A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts / Raina, N; Zavalloni, M; Targetti, S; D'Alberto, R; Raggi, M; Viaggi, D. - In: BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS. - ISSN 2280-6180. - ELETTRONICO. - 10:2(2021), pp. 137-152. [10.36253/bae-9678]

A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts

Raina, N
Primo
;
Zavalloni, M;Targetti, S;D'Alberto, R;Raggi, M;Viaggi, D
2021

Abstract

Contract attributes are strong motivators for eliciting farmers' preferences for a particular agri-environmental scheme. Our study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to highlight the attributes used in choice experiment studies of agri-environmental schemes using the PRISMA framework. We obtained 34 studies for an in-depth review, through which we extracted 32 attributes that were classified into five typologies: 'monetary' (7 attributes), 'general' (4 attributes), 'flexibility' (6 attributes), `prescription' (12 attributes), and 'purpose' (3 attributes). Though monetary attributes should theoretically define farmers' choices; general design and flexibility attributes are more critical for farmers' participation and willingness to accept. The study also discusses the lesser-used attributes that could be potentially explored in future studies. Thus, our review can be used as a reference by future AES studies to select their bundle of choice attributes and test with a broader range of attributes in their choice experiments.
2021
A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts / Raina, N; Zavalloni, M; Targetti, S; D'Alberto, R; Raggi, M; Viaggi, D. - In: BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS. - ISSN 2280-6180. - ELETTRONICO. - 10:2(2021), pp. 137-152. [10.36253/bae-9678]
Raina, N; Zavalloni, M; Targetti, S; D'Alberto, R; Raggi, M; Viaggi, D
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
9678-Article Text-32746-1-10-20211028 (4).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 480.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
480.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/859247
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact