Objectives: A previous single-country pilot study indicated serum anti-GM2 and anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies as potential biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis. This study aims to validate these findings in a large geographically heterogenous cohort. Materials and Methods: Sera from 175 dogs clinically diagnosed with acute canine polyradiculoneuritis, 112 dogs with other peripheral nerve, cranial nerve or neuromuscular disorders and 226 neurologically normal dogs were screened for anti-glycolipid antibodies against 11 common glycolipid targets to determine the immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis. Results: Anti-GM2 anti-glycolipid antibodies reached the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity: 65.1%, 95% confidence interval 57.6 to 72.2%; specificity: 90.2%, 95% confidence interval 83.1 to 95.0%), followed by anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies (sensitivity: 61.7%, 95% confidence interval 54.1 to 68.9%; specificity: 89.3%, 95% confidence interval 82.0 to 94.3%) and these anti-glycolipid antibodies were frequently present concomitantly. Anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies were detected in both acute canine polyradiculoneuritis and control animals. Both for anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies, sex was found a significantly associated factor with a female to male odds ratio of 2.55 (P=0.0096) and 3.00 (P=0.0198), respectively. Anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies were more commonly observed in dogs unable to walk (odds ratio 4.56; P=0.0076). Clinical Significance: Anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies represent serum biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis.

Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis / Halstead S.K.; Gourlay D.S.; Penderis J.; Bianchi E.; Dondi M.; Wessmann A.; Musteata M.; Le Chevoir M.; Martinez-Anton L.; Bhatti S.F.M.; Volk H.; Mateo I.; Tipold A.; Ives E.; Pakozdy A.; Gutierrez-Quintana R.; Brocal J.; Whitehead Z.; Granger N.; Pazzi P.; Harcourt-Brown T.; Jose-Lopez R.; Rupp S.; Schenk H.C.; Smith P.; Gandini G.; Menchetti M.; Mortera-Balsa V.; Rusbridge C.; Tauro A.; Cozzi F.; Deutschland M.; Tirrito F.; Freeman P.; Lowrie M.; Jackson M.R.; Willison H.J.; Rupp A.. - In: JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 0022-4510. - ELETTRONICO. - 63:2(2021), pp. 104-112. [10.1111/jsap.13439]

Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis

Gandini G.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021

Abstract

Objectives: A previous single-country pilot study indicated serum anti-GM2 and anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies as potential biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis. This study aims to validate these findings in a large geographically heterogenous cohort. Materials and Methods: Sera from 175 dogs clinically diagnosed with acute canine polyradiculoneuritis, 112 dogs with other peripheral nerve, cranial nerve or neuromuscular disorders and 226 neurologically normal dogs were screened for anti-glycolipid antibodies against 11 common glycolipid targets to determine the immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis. Results: Anti-GM2 anti-glycolipid antibodies reached the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity: 65.1%, 95% confidence interval 57.6 to 72.2%; specificity: 90.2%, 95% confidence interval 83.1 to 95.0%), followed by anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies (sensitivity: 61.7%, 95% confidence interval 54.1 to 68.9%; specificity: 89.3%, 95% confidence interval 82.0 to 94.3%) and these anti-glycolipid antibodies were frequently present concomitantly. Anti-GA1 anti-glycolipid antibodies were detected in both acute canine polyradiculoneuritis and control animals. Both for anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies, sex was found a significantly associated factor with a female to male odds ratio of 2.55 (P=0.0096) and 3.00 (P=0.0198), respectively. Anti-GalNAc-GD1a anti-glycolipid antibodies were more commonly observed in dogs unable to walk (odds ratio 4.56; P=0.0076). Clinical Significance: Anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a immunoglobulin G anti-glycolipid antibodies represent serum biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis.
2021
Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis / Halstead S.K.; Gourlay D.S.; Penderis J.; Bianchi E.; Dondi M.; Wessmann A.; Musteata M.; Le Chevoir M.; Martinez-Anton L.; Bhatti S.F.M.; Volk H.; Mateo I.; Tipold A.; Ives E.; Pakozdy A.; Gutierrez-Quintana R.; Brocal J.; Whitehead Z.; Granger N.; Pazzi P.; Harcourt-Brown T.; Jose-Lopez R.; Rupp S.; Schenk H.C.; Smith P.; Gandini G.; Menchetti M.; Mortera-Balsa V.; Rusbridge C.; Tauro A.; Cozzi F.; Deutschland M.; Tirrito F.; Freeman P.; Lowrie M.; Jackson M.R.; Willison H.J.; Rupp A.. - In: JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 0022-4510. - ELETTRONICO. - 63:2(2021), pp. 104-112. [10.1111/jsap.13439]
Halstead S.K.; Gourlay D.S.; Penderis J.; Bianchi E.; Dondi M.; Wessmann A.; Musteata M.; Le Chevoir M.; Martinez-Anton L.; Bhatti S.F.M.; Volk H.; Mateo I.; Tipold A.; Ives E.; Pakozdy A.; Gutierrez-Quintana R.; Brocal J.; Whitehead Z.; Granger N.; Pazzi P.; Harcourt-Brown T.; Jose-Lopez R.; Rupp S.; Schenk H.C.; Smith P.; Gandini G.; Menchetti M.; Mortera-Balsa V.; Rusbridge C.; Tauro A.; Cozzi F.; Deutschland M.; Tirrito F.; Freeman P.; Lowrie M.; Jackson M.R.; Willison H.J.; Rupp A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
63 - Serum anti-GM2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/857896
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact