Saprolegnia infections are among the main parasitic diseases affecting farmed salmonids. The distribution and potential transfer of Saprolegnia spp. between farms and the natural environment has been scarcely investigated. Therefore, this work aimed to study the diversity and abundance of oomycete species in salmonid farms, tributary water, and effluent water systems. Four trout farms in Italy and two Atlantic salmon farms in Scotland were considered. In Italian farms, 532 isolates of oomycetes were obtained from fish and water, at upstream, inside, and downstream the farms. In Scottish farms, 201 oomycetes isolates were obtained from water outside the farm and from fish and water inside the farming units. Isolates were identified to the species level through amplification and sequencing of the ITS rDNA region. In Italy, S. parasitica was significantly more present in farmed than in wild fish, while in water it was more frequently isolated from the wild, particularly in effluent systems, not associated with more frequent isolation of S. parasitica in wild fish downstream the farm. In Scotland, S. parasitica was the most prevalent species isolated from fish, while isolates from water were mostly Pythium spp. with few S. parasitica isolates from upstream and downstream the farms.

Evaluation of potential transfer of the pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica between farmed salmonids and wild fish / Tedesco P.; Saraiva M.; Sandoval-Sierra J.L.; Fioravanti M.L.; Morandi B.; Dieguez-Uribeondo J.; Van West P.; Galuppi R.. - In: PATHOGENS. - ISSN 2076-0817. - ELETTRONICO. - 10:8(2021), pp. 926.1-926.16. [10.3390/pathogens10080926]

Evaluation of potential transfer of the pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica between farmed salmonids and wild fish

Tedesco P.
;
Fioravanti M. L.;Galuppi R.
2021

Abstract

Saprolegnia infections are among the main parasitic diseases affecting farmed salmonids. The distribution and potential transfer of Saprolegnia spp. between farms and the natural environment has been scarcely investigated. Therefore, this work aimed to study the diversity and abundance of oomycete species in salmonid farms, tributary water, and effluent water systems. Four trout farms in Italy and two Atlantic salmon farms in Scotland were considered. In Italian farms, 532 isolates of oomycetes were obtained from fish and water, at upstream, inside, and downstream the farms. In Scottish farms, 201 oomycetes isolates were obtained from water outside the farm and from fish and water inside the farming units. Isolates were identified to the species level through amplification and sequencing of the ITS rDNA region. In Italy, S. parasitica was significantly more present in farmed than in wild fish, while in water it was more frequently isolated from the wild, particularly in effluent systems, not associated with more frequent isolation of S. parasitica in wild fish downstream the farm. In Scotland, S. parasitica was the most prevalent species isolated from fish, while isolates from water were mostly Pythium spp. with few S. parasitica isolates from upstream and downstream the farms.
2021
Evaluation of potential transfer of the pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica between farmed salmonids and wild fish / Tedesco P.; Saraiva M.; Sandoval-Sierra J.L.; Fioravanti M.L.; Morandi B.; Dieguez-Uribeondo J.; Van West P.; Galuppi R.. - In: PATHOGENS. - ISSN 2076-0817. - ELETTRONICO. - 10:8(2021), pp. 926.1-926.16. [10.3390/pathogens10080926]
Tedesco P.; Saraiva M.; Sandoval-Sierra J.L.; Fioravanti M.L.; Morandi B.; Dieguez-Uribeondo J.; Van West P.; Galuppi R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021 evaluation potential transfer saprolegnia pathogens-10-00926-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 2.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/856208
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact