Introduction: Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are usually categorized according to the predominant phenomenology; however, it is unclear whether this phenotypic classification mirrors the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Objective: To compare the characteristics of patients with different FMDs phenotypes and without co-morbid neurological disorders, aiming to answer the question of whether they represent different expressions of the same disorder or reflect distinct entities. Methods: Consecutive outpatients with a clinically definite diagnosis of FMDs were included in the Italian registry of functional motor disorders (IRFMD), a multicenter data collection platform gathering several clinical and demographic variables. To the aim of the current work, data of patients with isolated FMDs were extracted. Results: A total of 176 patients were included: 58 with weakness, 40 with tremor, 38 with dystonia, 23 with jerks/facial FMDs, and 17 with gait disorders. Patients with tremor and gait disorders were older than the others. Patients with functional weakness had more commonly an acute onset (87.9%) than patients with tremor and gait disorders, a shorter time lag from symptoms onset and FMDs diagnosis (2.9 ± 3.5 years) than patients with dystonia, and had more frequently associated functional sensory symptoms (51.7%) than patients with tremor, dystonia and gait disorders. Patients with dystonia complained more often of associated pain (47.4%) than patients with tremor. No other differences were noted between groups in terms of other variables including associated functional neurological symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, and predisposing or precipitating factors. Conclusions: Our data support the evidence of a large overlap between FMD phenotypes.

Tinazzi M., Geroin C., Marcuzzo E., Cuoco S., Ceravolo R., Mazzucchi S., et al. (2021). Functional motor phenotypes: to lump or to split?. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 268(12), 4737-4743 [10.1007/s00415-021-10583-w].

Functional motor phenotypes: to lump or to split?

Calandra Buonaura G.;
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are usually categorized according to the predominant phenomenology; however, it is unclear whether this phenotypic classification mirrors the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Objective: To compare the characteristics of patients with different FMDs phenotypes and without co-morbid neurological disorders, aiming to answer the question of whether they represent different expressions of the same disorder or reflect distinct entities. Methods: Consecutive outpatients with a clinically definite diagnosis of FMDs were included in the Italian registry of functional motor disorders (IRFMD), a multicenter data collection platform gathering several clinical and demographic variables. To the aim of the current work, data of patients with isolated FMDs were extracted. Results: A total of 176 patients were included: 58 with weakness, 40 with tremor, 38 with dystonia, 23 with jerks/facial FMDs, and 17 with gait disorders. Patients with tremor and gait disorders were older than the others. Patients with functional weakness had more commonly an acute onset (87.9%) than patients with tremor and gait disorders, a shorter time lag from symptoms onset and FMDs diagnosis (2.9 ± 3.5 years) than patients with dystonia, and had more frequently associated functional sensory symptoms (51.7%) than patients with tremor, dystonia and gait disorders. Patients with dystonia complained more often of associated pain (47.4%) than patients with tremor. No other differences were noted between groups in terms of other variables including associated functional neurological symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, and predisposing or precipitating factors. Conclusions: Our data support the evidence of a large overlap between FMD phenotypes.
2021
Tinazzi M., Geroin C., Marcuzzo E., Cuoco S., Ceravolo R., Mazzucchi S., et al. (2021). Functional motor phenotypes: to lump or to split?. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 268(12), 4737-4743 [10.1007/s00415-021-10583-w].
Tinazzi M.; Geroin C.; Marcuzzo E.; Cuoco S.; Ceravolo R.; Mazzucchi S.; Pilotto A.; Padovani A.; Romito L.M.; Eleopra R.; Zappia M.; Nicoletti A.; Da...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00415-021-10583-w.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 587.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
587.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
415_2021_10583_MOESM1_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 16.37 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
16.37 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/855349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact