Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy of the female reproductive organs. Historically it was divided into type I and type II, until 2013 when the Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification was proposed. Here, we applied the different classification types on our endometrial cancer patient cohort in order to identify the most predictive one. We enrolled 117 endometrial cancer patients available for the study and collected the following parameters: age, body mass index, stage, menopause, Lynch syndrome status, parity, hypertension, type of localization of the lesion at hysteroscopy, type of surgery and complications, and presence of metachronous or synchronous tumors. The tumors were classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology, Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer, Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma, and Cancer Genome Atlas classification schemes. Our data confirmed that European Society for Medical Oncology risk was the strongest predictor of prognosis in our cohort. The parameters correlated with poor prognosis were the histotype, FIGO stage, and grade. Our study cohort shows that risk stratification should be based on the integration of histologic, clinical, and molecular parameters.

Coada C.A., Dondi G., Ravegnini G., De Leo A., Santini D., De Crescenzo E., et al. (2022). Classification systems of endometrial cancer: A comparative study about old and new. DIAGNOSTICS, 12(1), 1-15 [10.3390/diagnostics12010033].

Classification systems of endometrial cancer: A comparative study about old and new

Dondi G.;Ravegnini G.;De Leo A.;De Crescenzo E.;Bovicelli A.;Giunchi S.;Dormi A.;Di Stanislao M.;Morganti A. G.;De Biase D.;De Iaco P.;Perrone A. M.
2022

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy of the female reproductive organs. Historically it was divided into type I and type II, until 2013 when the Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification was proposed. Here, we applied the different classification types on our endometrial cancer patient cohort in order to identify the most predictive one. We enrolled 117 endometrial cancer patients available for the study and collected the following parameters: age, body mass index, stage, menopause, Lynch syndrome status, parity, hypertension, type of localization of the lesion at hysteroscopy, type of surgery and complications, and presence of metachronous or synchronous tumors. The tumors were classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology, Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer, Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma, and Cancer Genome Atlas classification schemes. Our data confirmed that European Society for Medical Oncology risk was the strongest predictor of prognosis in our cohort. The parameters correlated with poor prognosis were the histotype, FIGO stage, and grade. Our study cohort shows that risk stratification should be based on the integration of histologic, clinical, and molecular parameters.
2022
Coada C.A., Dondi G., Ravegnini G., De Leo A., Santini D., De Crescenzo E., et al. (2022). Classification systems of endometrial cancer: A comparative study about old and new. DIAGNOSTICS, 12(1), 1-15 [10.3390/diagnostics12010033].
Coada C.A.; Dondi G.; Ravegnini G.; De Leo A.; Santini D.; De Crescenzo E.; Tesei M.; Bovicelli A.; Giunchi S.; Dormi A.; Di Stanislao M.; Morganti A....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diagnostics-12-00033.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 842.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
842.67 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/852433
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact