The accessibility hierarchy was first proposed by Keenan & Comrie (1977) to describe the cross-linguistic distribution of relative markers in terms of likelihood of relativization of different syntactic roles. The hierarchy is also commonly believed to reflect constraints on possible changes in the domain of relativization. For example, the hierarchy predicts that locative relatives that develop into general relativizers should expand their functional range in a step-by-step fashion from lower to higher roles. In this paper, we revise existing claims about the diachrony of locative relatives. In doing so, we survey known cases of locative relatives that develop into general relativizers and we also discuss data from linguistic variation in non-standard varieties in European languages, with a focus on social variation in Italian. As we argue, data from Italian suggests that another possible cline of development of locative relatives should be acknowledged, that is, locative > concern > subject.

The development of locative relative markers: from typology to sociolinguistics (and back) / Silvia Ballarè; Guglielmo Inglese. - In: STUDIES IN LANGUAGE. - ISSN 0378-4177. - ELETTRONICO. - 46:1(2022), pp. 220-257. [10.1075/sl.20013.bal]

The development of locative relative markers: from typology to sociolinguistics (and back)

Silvia Ballarè
;
2022

Abstract

The accessibility hierarchy was first proposed by Keenan & Comrie (1977) to describe the cross-linguistic distribution of relative markers in terms of likelihood of relativization of different syntactic roles. The hierarchy is also commonly believed to reflect constraints on possible changes in the domain of relativization. For example, the hierarchy predicts that locative relatives that develop into general relativizers should expand their functional range in a step-by-step fashion from lower to higher roles. In this paper, we revise existing claims about the diachrony of locative relatives. In doing so, we survey known cases of locative relatives that develop into general relativizers and we also discuss data from linguistic variation in non-standard varieties in European languages, with a focus on social variation in Italian. As we argue, data from Italian suggests that another possible cline of development of locative relatives should be acknowledged, that is, locative > concern > subject.
2022
The development of locative relative markers: from typology to sociolinguistics (and back) / Silvia Ballarè; Guglielmo Inglese. - In: STUDIES IN LANGUAGE. - ISSN 0378-4177. - ELETTRONICO. - 46:1(2022), pp. 220-257. [10.1075/sl.20013.bal]
Silvia Ballarè; Guglielmo Inglese
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022. Ballarè & Inglese.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 644.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
644.01 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/852431
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact