Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
Multiplex families with a high prevalence of a psychiatric disorder are often examined to identify rare genetic variants with large effect sizes. In the present study, we analysed whether the risk for bipolar disorder (BD) in BD multiplex families is influenced by common genetic variants. Furthermore, we investigated whether this risk is conferred mainly by BD-specific risk variants or by variants also associated with the susceptibility to schizophrenia or major depression. In total, 395 individuals from 33 Andalusian BD multiplex families (166 BD, 78 major depressive disorder, 151 unaffected) as well as 438 subjects from an independent, BD case/control cohort (161 unrelated BD, 277 unrelated controls) were analysed. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for BD, schizophrenia (SCZ), and major depression were calculated and compared between the cohorts. Both the familial BD cases and unaffected family members had higher PRS for all three psychiatric disorders than the independent controls, with BD and SCZ being significant after correction for multiple testing, suggesting a high baseline risk for several psychiatric disorders in the families. Moreover, familial BD cases showed significantly higher BD PRS than unaffected family members and unrelated BD cases. A plausible hypothesis is that, in multiplex families with a general increase in risk for psychiatric disease, BD development is attributable to a high burden of common variants that confer a specific risk for BD. The present analyses demonstrated that common genetic risk variants for psychiatric disorders are likely to contribute to the high incidence of affective psychiatric disorders in the multiplex families. However, the PRS explained only part of the observed phenotypic variance, and rare variants might have also contributed to disease development.
Andlauer T.F.M., Guzman-Parra J., Streit F., Strohmaier J., Gonzalez M.J., Gil Flores S., et al. (2021). Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 26(4), 1286-1298 [10.1038/s41380-019-0558-2].
Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders
Andlauer T. F. M.;Guzman-Parra J.;Streit F.;Strohmaier J.;Gonzalez M. J.;Gil Flores S.;Cabaleiro Fabeiro F. J.;del Rio Noriega F.;Perez F. P.;Haro Gonzalez J.;Orozco Diaz G.;de Diego-Otero Y.;Moreno-Kustner B.;Auburger G.;Degenhardt F.;Heilmann-Heimbach S.;Herms S.;Hoffmann P.;Frank J.;Foo J. C.;Treutlein J.;Witt S. H.;Cichon S.;Kogevinas M.;Stahl E. A.;Breen G.;Forstner A. J.;McQuillin A.;Ripke S.;Trubetskoy V.;Mattheisen M.;Wang Y.;Coleman J. R. I.;Gaspar H. A.;de Leeuw C. A.;Steinberg S.;Pavlides J. M. W.;Trzaskowski M.;Pers T. H.;Holmans P. A.;Abbott L.;Agerbo E.;Akil H.;Albani D.;Alliey-Rodriguez N.;Als T. D.;Anjorin A.;Antilla V.;Awasthi S.;Badner J. A.;Baekvad-Hansen M.;Barchas J. D.;Bass N.;Bauer M.;Belliveau R.;Bergen S. E.;Pedersen C. B.;Boen E.;Boks M.;Boocock J.;Budde M.;Bunney W.;Burmeister M.;Bybjerg-Grauholm J.;Byerley W.;Casas M.;Cerrato F.;Cervantes P.;Chambert K.;Charney A. W.;Chen D.;Churchhouse C.;Clarke T. -K.;Coryell W.;Craig D. W.;Cruceanu C.;Czerski P. M.;Dale A. M.;de Jong S.;Degenhardt F.;Del-Favero J.;DePaulo J. R.;Djurovic S.;Dobbyn A. L.;Dumont A.;Elvsashagen T.;Escott-Price V.;Fan C. C.;Fischer S. B.;Flickinger M.;Foroud T. M.;Forty L.;Frank J.;Fraser C.;Freimer N. B.;Frisen L.;Gade K.;Gage D.;Garnham J.;Giambartolomei C.;Pedersen M. G.;Goldstein J.;Gordon S. D.;Gordon-Smith K.;Green E. K.;Green M. J.;Greenwood T. A.;Grove J.;Guan W.;Parra J. G.;Hamshere M. L.;Hautzinger M.;Heilbronner U.;Herms S.;Hipolito M.;Hoffmann P.;Holland D.;Huckins L.;Jamain S.;Johnson J. S.;Jureus A.;Kandaswamy R.;Karlsson R.;Kennedy J. L.;Kittel-Schneider S.;Knowles J. A.;Kogevinas M.;Koller A. C.;Kupka R.;Lavebratt C.;Lawrence J.;Lawson W. B.;Leber M.;Lee P. H.;Levy S. E.;Li J. Z.;Liu C.;Lucae S.;Maaser A.;MacIntyre D. J.;Mahon P. B.;Maier W.;Martinsson L.;McCarroll S.;McGuffin P.;McInnis M. G.;McKay J. D.;Medeiros H.;Medland S. E.;Meng F.;Milani L.;Montgomery G. W.;Morris D. W.;Muhleisen T. W.;Mullins N.;Nguyen H.;Nievergelt C. M.;Adolfsson A. N.;Nwulia E. A.;O'Donovan C.;Loohuis L. M. O.;Ori A. P. S.;Oruc L.;Osby U.;Perlis R. H.;Perry A.;Pfennig A.;Potash J. B.;Purcell S. M.;Regeer E. J.;Reif A.;Reinbold C. S.;Rice J. P.;Richards A. L.;Rivas F.;Rivera M.;Roussos P.;Ruderfer D. M.;Ryu E.;Sanchez-Mora C.;Schatzberg A. F.;Scheftner W. A.;Schork N. J.;Weickert C. S.;Shehktman T.;Shilling P. D.;Sigurdsson E.;Slaney C.;Smeland O. B.;Sobell J. L.;Hansen C. S.;Spijker A. T.;Clair D. S.;Steffens M.;Strauss J. S.;Streit F.;Strohmaier J.;Szelinger S.;Thompson R. C.;EThorgeirsson T.;Treutlein J.;Vedde H.;Wang W.;Watson S. J.;Weickert T. W.;Witt S. H.;Xi S.;Xu W.;Young A. H.;Zandi P.;Zhang P.;Zollner S.;Adolfsson R.;Agartz I.;Alda M.;Backlund L.;Baune B. T.;Bellivier F.;Berrettini W. H.;Biernacka J. M.;Blackwood D. H. R.;Boehnke M.;Borglum A. D.;Corvin A.;Craddock N.;Daly M. J.;Dannlowski U.;Esko T.;Etain B.;Frye M.;Fullerton J. M.;Gershon E. S.;Gill M.;Goes F.;Grigoroiu-Serbanescu M.;Hauser J.;Hougaard D. M.;Hultman C. M.;Jones I.;Jones L. A.;Kahn R. S.;Kirov G.;Landen M.;Leboyer M.;Lewis C. M.;Li Q. S.;Lissowska J.;Martin N. G.;Mayoral F.;McElroy S. L.;McIntosh A. M.;McMahon F. J.;Melle I.;Metspalu A.;Mitchell P. B.;Morken G.;Mors O.;Mortensen P. B.;Muller-Myhsok B.;Myers R. M.;Neale B. M.;Nimgaonkar V.;Nordentoft M.;Nothen M. M.;O'Donovan M. C.;Oedegaard K. J.;Owen M. J.;Paciga S. A.;Pato C.;Pato M. T.;Posthuma D.;Ramos-Quiroga J. A.;Ribases M.;Rietschel M.;Rouleau G. A.;Schalling M.;Schofield P. R.;Schulze T. G.;Serretti A.;Smoller J. W.;Stefansson H.;Stefansson K.;Stordal E.;Sullivan P. F.;Turecki G.;Vaaler A. E.;Vieta E.;Vincent J. B.;Werge T.;Nurnberger J. I.;Wray N. R.;Florio A. D.;Edenberg H. J.;Cichon S.;Ophoff R. A.;Scott L. J.;Andreassen O. A.;Kelsoe J.;Sklar P.;Ripke S.;Mattheisen M.;Trzaskowski M.;Byrne E. M.;Abdellaoui A.;Adams M. J.;Agerbo E.;Air T. M.;Bacanu S. -A.;Baekvad-Hansen M.;Beekman A. T. F.;Bigdeli T. B.;Binder E. B.;Bryois J.;Buttenschon H. N.;Bybjerg-Grauholm J.;Cai N.;Castelao E.;Christensen J. H.;Clarke T. -K.;Coleman J. R. I.;Colodro-Conde L.;Couvy-Duchesne B.;Craddock N.;Crawford G. E.;Davies G.;Deary I. J.;Degenhardt F.;Derks E. M.;Direk N.;Dolan C. V.;Dunn E. C.;Eley T. C.;Escott-Price V.;Kiadeh F. F. H.;Finucane H. K.;Foo J. C.;Forstner A. J.;Frank J.;Gaspar H. A.;Gill M.;Goes F. S.;Gordon S. D.;Grove J.;Hall L. S.;Hansen C. S.;Hansen T. F.;Herms S.;Hickie I. B.;Hoffmann P.;Homuth G.;Horn C.;Hottenga J. -J.;Hougaard D. M.;Howard D. M.;Ising M.;Jansen R.;Jorgenson E.;Knowles J. A.;Kohane I. S.;Hill;Kraft J.;Kretzschmar W. W.;Kutalik Z.;Li Y.;Lind P. A.;MacIntyre D. J.;MacKinnon D. F.;Maier R. M.;Maier W.;Marchini J.;Mbarek H.;McGrath P.;McGuffin P.;Mehta D.;Middeldorp C. M.;Mihailov E.;Milaneschi Y.;Milani L.;Mondimore F. M.;Montgomery G. W.;Mostafavi S.;Mullins N.;Nauck M.;Ng B.;Nivard M. G.;Nyholt D. R.;O'Reilly P. F.;Oskarsson H.;Painter J. N.;Pedersen C. B.;Pedersen M. G.;Peterson R. E.;Pettersson E.;Peyrot W. J.;Pistis G.;Posthuma D.;Quiroz J. A.;Qvist P.;Rice J. P.;Riley B. P.;Rivera M.;Mirza S. S.;Schoevers R.;Schulte E. C.;Shen L.;Shi J.;Shyn S. I.;Sigurdsson E.;Sinnamon G. C. B.;Smit J. H.;Smith D. J.;Steinberg S.;Streit F.;Strohmaier J.;Tansey K. E.;Teismann H.;Teumer A.;Thompson W.;Thomson P. A.;Thorgeirsson T. E.;Traylor M.;Treutlein J.;Trubetskoy V.;Uitterlinden A. G.;Umbricht D.;Van der Auwera S.;van Hemert A. M.;Viktorin A.;Visscher P. M.;Wang Y.;Webb B. T.;Weinsheimer S. M.;Wellmann J.;Willemsen G.;Witt S. H.;Wu Y.;Xi H. S.;Yang J.;Zhang F.;Arolt V.;Baune B. T.;Berger K.;Boomsma D. I.;Cichon S.;de Geus E. J. C.;DePaulo J. R.;Domenici E.;Domschke K.;Esko T.;Grabe H. J.;Hamilton S. P.;Hayward C.;Heath A. C.;Kendler K. S.;Kloiber S.;Lewis G.;Li Q. S.;Lucae S.;Madden P. A. F.;Magnusson P. K.;Martin N. G.;McIntosh A. M.;Metspalu A.;Mors O.;Muller-Myhsok B.;Nordentoft M.;Nothen M. M.;O'Donovan M. C.;Paciga S. A.;Pedersen N. L.;Penninx B. W. J. H.;Perlis R. H.;Porteous D. J.;Potash J. B.;Preisig M.;Rietschel M.;Schaefer C.;Schulze T. G.;Smoller J. W.;Tiemeier H.;Uher R.;Volzke H.;Weissman M. M.;Werge T.;Levinson D. F.;Borglum A. D.;Sullivan P. F.;Rivas F.;Mayoral F.;Muller-Myhsok B.;Forstner A. J.;Nothen M. M.;Rietschel M.
2021
Abstract
Multiplex families with a high prevalence of a psychiatric disorder are often examined to identify rare genetic variants with large effect sizes. In the present study, we analysed whether the risk for bipolar disorder (BD) in BD multiplex families is influenced by common genetic variants. Furthermore, we investigated whether this risk is conferred mainly by BD-specific risk variants or by variants also associated with the susceptibility to schizophrenia or major depression. In total, 395 individuals from 33 Andalusian BD multiplex families (166 BD, 78 major depressive disorder, 151 unaffected) as well as 438 subjects from an independent, BD case/control cohort (161 unrelated BD, 277 unrelated controls) were analysed. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for BD, schizophrenia (SCZ), and major depression were calculated and compared between the cohorts. Both the familial BD cases and unaffected family members had higher PRS for all three psychiatric disorders than the independent controls, with BD and SCZ being significant after correction for multiple testing, suggesting a high baseline risk for several psychiatric disorders in the families. Moreover, familial BD cases showed significantly higher BD PRS than unaffected family members and unrelated BD cases. A plausible hypothesis is that, in multiplex families with a general increase in risk for psychiatric disease, BD development is attributable to a high burden of common variants that confer a specific risk for BD. The present analyses demonstrated that common genetic risk variants for psychiatric disorders are likely to contribute to the high incidence of affective psychiatric disorders in the multiplex families. However, the PRS explained only part of the observed phenotypic variance, and rare variants might have also contributed to disease development.
Andlauer T.F.M., Guzman-Parra J., Streit F., Strohmaier J., Gonzalez M.J., Gil Flores S., et al. (2021). Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 26(4), 1286-1298 [10.1038/s41380-019-0558-2].
Andlauer T.F.M.; Guzman-Parra J.; Streit F.; Strohmaier J.; Gonzalez M.J.; Gil Flores S.; Cabaleiro Fabeiro F.J.; del Rio Noriega F.; Perez F.P.; Haro...espandi
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/850134
Citazioni
15
27
24
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.