In this paper we investigate the effect of moral suasion on ingroup favouritism. We report a well-powered, pre-registered, two-stage 2x2 mixed-design experiment. In the first stage, groups are formed on the basis of how participants answer to a set of questions, concerning non-morally relevant issues in one treatment (assortativity on non-moral preferences), and morally relevant issues in another treatment (assortativity on moral preferences). In the second stage, participants choose how to split a given amount of money between participants of their own group and participants of the other group, first in the baseline setting and then in a setting where they are told to do what they believe to be morally right (moral suasion). Our main results are: (i) in the baseline, participants tend to favour their own group to a greater extent when groups are assorted according to moral preferences, compared to when they are assorted according to non-moral preferences; (ii) the net effect of moral suasion is to decrease ingroup favouritism, but there is also a non-negligible proportion of participants for whom moral suasion increases ingroup favouritism; (iii) the effect of moral suasion is substantially stable across group assortativity and four pre-registered individual characteristics (gender, political orientation, religiosity, pro-life vs pro-choice ethical convictions).

"Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion / Bilancini, Ennio; Boncinelli, Leonardo; Capraro, Valerio; Celadin, Tatiana; Di Paolo, Roberto. - In: JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING. - ISSN 1930-2975. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:2(2020), pp. 182-192. [10.1017/S1930297500007336]

"Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion

Celadin, Tatiana
;
2020

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the effect of moral suasion on ingroup favouritism. We report a well-powered, pre-registered, two-stage 2x2 mixed-design experiment. In the first stage, groups are formed on the basis of how participants answer to a set of questions, concerning non-morally relevant issues in one treatment (assortativity on non-moral preferences), and morally relevant issues in another treatment (assortativity on moral preferences). In the second stage, participants choose how to split a given amount of money between participants of their own group and participants of the other group, first in the baseline setting and then in a setting where they are told to do what they believe to be morally right (moral suasion). Our main results are: (i) in the baseline, participants tend to favour their own group to a greater extent when groups are assorted according to moral preferences, compared to when they are assorted according to non-moral preferences; (ii) the net effect of moral suasion is to decrease ingroup favouritism, but there is also a non-negligible proportion of participants for whom moral suasion increases ingroup favouritism; (iii) the effect of moral suasion is substantially stable across group assortativity and four pre-registered individual characteristics (gender, political orientation, religiosity, pro-life vs pro-choice ethical convictions).
2020
"Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion / Bilancini, Ennio; Boncinelli, Leonardo; Capraro, Valerio; Celadin, Tatiana; Di Paolo, Roberto. - In: JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING. - ISSN 1930-2975. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:2(2020), pp. 182-192. [10.1017/S1930297500007336]
Bilancini, Ennio; Boncinelli, Leonardo; Capraro, Valerio; Celadin, Tatiana; Di Paolo, Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
do-the-right-thing-for-whom-an-experiment-on-ingroup-favouritism-group-assorting-and-moral-suasion.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 243.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
243.75 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/849430
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact