The increasing use of microbicides in consumer products is raising concerns related to enhanced microbicide resistance in bacteria and potential cross resistance to antibiotics. The recently published documents on this topic from the European Commission have spawned much interest to better understand the true extent of the putative links for the benefit of the manufacturers, regulators, and consumers alike. This white paper is based on a 2-day workshop (SEAC-Unilever, Bedford, United Kingdom; June 2012) in the fields of microbicide usage and resistance. It identifies gaps in our knowledge and also makes specific recommendations for harmonization of key terms and refinement/standardization of methods for testing microbicide resistance to better assess the impact and possible links with cross resistance to antibiotics. It also calls for a better cohesion in research in this field. Such information is crucial to developing any risk assessment framework on microbicide use notably in consumer products. The article also identifies key research questions where there are inadequate data, which, if addressed, could promote improved knowledge and understanding to assess any related risks for consumer and environmental safety.

Does microbicide use in consumer products promote antimicrobial resistance? A critical review and recommendations for a cohesive approach to risk assessment / Maillard JY; Bloomfield S; Coelho JR; Collier P; Cookson B; Fanning S; Hill A; Hartemann P; McBain AJ; Oggioni M; Sattar S; Schweizer HP; Threlfall J. - In: MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE. - ISSN 1076-6294. - STAMPA. - 19:5(2013), pp. 344-354. [10.1089/mdr.2013.0039]

Does microbicide use in consumer products promote antimicrobial resistance? A critical review and recommendations for a cohesive approach to risk assessment

Oggioni M;
2013

Abstract

The increasing use of microbicides in consumer products is raising concerns related to enhanced microbicide resistance in bacteria and potential cross resistance to antibiotics. The recently published documents on this topic from the European Commission have spawned much interest to better understand the true extent of the putative links for the benefit of the manufacturers, regulators, and consumers alike. This white paper is based on a 2-day workshop (SEAC-Unilever, Bedford, United Kingdom; June 2012) in the fields of microbicide usage and resistance. It identifies gaps in our knowledge and also makes specific recommendations for harmonization of key terms and refinement/standardization of methods for testing microbicide resistance to better assess the impact and possible links with cross resistance to antibiotics. It also calls for a better cohesion in research in this field. Such information is crucial to developing any risk assessment framework on microbicide use notably in consumer products. The article also identifies key research questions where there are inadequate data, which, if addressed, could promote improved knowledge and understanding to assess any related risks for consumer and environmental safety.
2013
Does microbicide use in consumer products promote antimicrobial resistance? A critical review and recommendations for a cohesive approach to risk assessment / Maillard JY; Bloomfield S; Coelho JR; Collier P; Cookson B; Fanning S; Hill A; Hartemann P; McBain AJ; Oggioni M; Sattar S; Schweizer HP; Threlfall J. - In: MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE. - ISSN 1076-6294. - STAMPA. - 19:5(2013), pp. 344-354. [10.1089/mdr.2013.0039]
Maillard JY; Bloomfield S; Coelho JR; Collier P; Cookson B; Fanning S; Hill A; Hartemann P; McBain AJ; Oggioni M; Sattar S; Schweizer HP; Threlfall J
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/848841
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 51
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact