Introduction The aim of this article was to describe, step-by-step, an original technique (T-L technique) in a single centre series of patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and analyze perioperative outcomes.Material and methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 567 patients who underwent HoLEP. The T-L technique consists of a series of incisions used as landmarks, performed at the beginning of the procedure before enucleation. Two T-shape incisions are performed at the level of bladder neck (at the 5-7 and 12 o'clock positions); two L-shape incisions are performed at the level of verumontanum, bilaterally, to mark the apex and to limit the sphincter. Another T-shape incision is performed on the bladder neck at the 12 o'clock position posterior to the level of verumontanum.Results The median operative time (OT) was 80 minutes (IQR 64-105); 50 minutes (IQR 35-70) and 15 minutes (IQR 10-20) for enucleation and the morcellation phase, respectively. Conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was necessary in 3/567 (0.6%) patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% of cases, capsule perforation occurred in 12/567 (2%) of cases, while bladder perforation during morcellation occurred in 8/567 (1.4%) of cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 20/567 (3.5%) of patients. Specifically, grade 1-2 occurred in 19/567 (3.3%) and grade 3 was recorded in 1/567 (0.2%).Conclusions The T-L technique for HoLEP is safe and reproducible with a low rate of perioperative complications. The positioning of some landmarks before enucleation allows for the better orientation during enucleation and could be very useful in case of large prostates.

Porreca, A., Schiavina, R., Romagnoli, D., Corsi, P., Salvaggio, A., D'Agostino, D., et al. (2021). T-L technique for HoLEP: perioperative outcomes of a large single-centre series. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 74(3), 366-371 [10.5173/ceju.2021.3.105].

T-L technique for HoLEP: perioperative outcomes of a large single-centre series

Schiavina, Riccardo;
2021

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this article was to describe, step-by-step, an original technique (T-L technique) in a single centre series of patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and analyze perioperative outcomes.Material and methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 567 patients who underwent HoLEP. The T-L technique consists of a series of incisions used as landmarks, performed at the beginning of the procedure before enucleation. Two T-shape incisions are performed at the level of bladder neck (at the 5-7 and 12 o'clock positions); two L-shape incisions are performed at the level of verumontanum, bilaterally, to mark the apex and to limit the sphincter. Another T-shape incision is performed on the bladder neck at the 12 o'clock position posterior to the level of verumontanum.Results The median operative time (OT) was 80 minutes (IQR 64-105); 50 minutes (IQR 35-70) and 15 minutes (IQR 10-20) for enucleation and the morcellation phase, respectively. Conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was necessary in 3/567 (0.6%) patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% of cases, capsule perforation occurred in 12/567 (2%) of cases, while bladder perforation during morcellation occurred in 8/567 (1.4%) of cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 20/567 (3.5%) of patients. Specifically, grade 1-2 occurred in 19/567 (3.3%) and grade 3 was recorded in 1/567 (0.2%).Conclusions The T-L technique for HoLEP is safe and reproducible with a low rate of perioperative complications. The positioning of some landmarks before enucleation allows for the better orientation during enucleation and could be very useful in case of large prostates.
2021
Porreca, A., Schiavina, R., Romagnoli, D., Corsi, P., Salvaggio, A., D'Agostino, D., et al. (2021). T-L technique for HoLEP: perioperative outcomes of a large single-centre series. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 74(3), 366-371 [10.5173/ceju.2021.3.105].
Porreca, Angelo; Schiavina, Riccardo; Romagnoli, Daniele; Corsi, Paolo; Salvaggio, Antonio; D'Agostino, Daniele; Ferro, Matteo; Busetto, Gian Maria; F...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/847788
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact