Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
Background: The “Sarcopenia and Physical Frailty in Older People: Multicomponent Treatment Strategies” (SPRINTT) project sponsored a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the objective to determine the effect of physical activity and nutrition intervention for prevention of mobility disability in community-dwelling frail older Europeans. We describe here the design and feasibility of the SPRINTT nutrition intervention, including techniques used by nutrition interventionists to identify those at risk of malnutrition and to carry out the nutrition intervention. Methods: SPRINTT RCT recruited older adults (≥ 70 years) from 11 European countries. Eligible participants (n = 1517) had functional limitations measured with Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB score 3–9) and low muscle mass as determined by DXA scans, but were able to walk 400 m without assistance within 15 min. Participants were followed up for up to 3 years. The nutrition intervention was carried out mainly by individual nutrition counseling. Nutrition goals included achieving a daily protein intake of 1.0–1.2 g/kg body weight, energy intake of 25–30 kcal/kg of body weight/day, and serum vitamin D concentration ≥ 75 mmol/L. Survey on the method strategies and feasibility of the nutrition intervention was sent to all nutrition interventionists of the 16 SPRINTT study sites. Results: Nutrition interventionists from all study sites responded to the survey. All responders found that the SPRINTT nutrition intervention was feasible for the target population, and it was well received by the majority. The identification of participants at nutritional risk was accomplished by combining information from interviews, questionnaires, clinical and laboratory data. Although the nutrition intervention was mainly carried out using individual nutritional counselling, other assisting methods were used as appropriate. Conclusion: The SPRINTT nutrition intervention was feasible and able to adapt flexibly to varying needs of this heterogeneous population. The procedures adopted to identify older adults at risk of malnutrition and to design the appropriate intervention may serve as a model to deliver nutrition intervention for community-dwelling older people with mobility limitations.
Jyvakorpi S.K., Ramel A., Strandberg T.E., Piotrowicz K., Blaszczyk-Bebenek E., Urtamo A., et al. (2021). The sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people: multi-component treatment strategies (SPRINTT) project: description and feasibility of a nutrition intervention in community-dwelling older Europeans. EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 12(2), 303-312 [10.1007/s41999-020-00438-4].
The sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people: multi-component treatment strategies (SPRINTT) project: description and feasibility of a nutrition intervention in community-dwelling older Europeans
Jyvakorpi S. K.;Ramel A.;Strandberg T. E.;Piotrowicz K.;Blaszczyk-Bebenek E.;Urtamo A.;Rempe H. M.;Geirsdottir O.;Vagnerova T.;Billot M.;Larreur A.;Savera G.;Soriano G.;Picauron C.;Tagliaferri S.;Sanchez-Puelles C.;Cadenas V. S.;Perl A.;Tirrel L.;Ohman H.;Weling-Scheepers C.;Ambrosi S.;Costantini A.;Pavelkova K.;Klimkova M.;Freiberger E.;Jonsson P. V.;Marzetti E.;Pitkala K. H.;Landi F.;Calvani R.;Bernabei R.;Boni C.;Brandi V.;Broccatelli M.;Calvani R.;Celesti C.;Cicchetti A.;Collamati A.;Coretti S.;D'Angelo E.;D'Elia M.;Landi F.;Landi G.;Lorenzi M.;Mariotti L.;Martone A. M.;Ortolani E.;Pafundi T.;Picca A.;Ruggeri M.;Salini S.;Savera G.;Tosato M.;Vetrano D. L.;Lattanzio F.;Baldoni R.;Bernabei S.;Bonfigli A. R.;Bustacchini S.;Carrieri B.;Cassetta L.;Cherubini A.;Cucchi M.;Cucchieri G.;Costantini A. R.;Dell'Aquila G.;Espinosa E.;Fedecostante M.;Fraternali R.;Galeazzi R.;Mengarelli A.;Piomboni S.;Posacki E.;Severini E.;Tregambe T.;Trotta F.;Maggio M.;Lauretani F.;Butto V.;Fisichella A.;Guareschi C.;Longobucco Y.;Tagliaferri S.;Di Bari M.;Rodriguez-Manas L.;Alamo S.;Bouzon C. A.;Gonzales Turin J.;Zafra O. L. L.;Picazo A. L.;Sepulveda L. P.;SanchezSanchez J. L.;Puelles C. S.;Aragones M. V.;CruzJentoft A. J.;Santos J. A.;Alvarez-Nebreda L.;JimenezJimenez N. F.;Nozal J. M. -D.;Montero-Errasquin B.;Moreno B. P. B. P.;Roldan-Plaza C.;Vicente A. R. -D.;Sanchez-Cadenas V.;Sanchez-Castellano C.;Sanchez-Garcia E.;Vaquero-Pinto M. N.;Topinkova E.;Bautzka L.;Blechova K.;Gueye T.;Juklickova I.;Klbikova T.;Krenkova J. J.;Madlova P.;Mejstrikova H.;Melcova R.;Michalkova H.;Ryznarova I.;Drastichova I.;Hasalikova E.;Hucko R.;Jakub S.;Janacova M.;Kilmkova M.;Parizkova M.;Pavelkova K.;Redrova M.;Ruskova P. P.;Sieber C. C.;Auerswald T.;Engel C.;Franke A.;Freibergen E.;Freiheit U.;Gotthardt S.;Kampe K.;Kob R.;Kokott C.;Kraska C.;Meyer C.;Reith V.;Rempe H.;Schoene D.;Sieber G.;Zielinski K.;Anker S. D.;Ebner N.;Grutz R.;von Haehling S.;Schols A. M. W. J.;Gosker H.;Huysmans S.;Quaaden S.;Schols J. M.;Smeets N.;Stevens P.;van de Bool C.;Weling C.;Strandberg T.;Jyvakorpi S.;Hallikas K.;Herranen M.;Huusko T.;Hytonen L.;Ikonen K.;Karppi-Sjoblom A.;Karvinen K.;Kayhty M.;Kindsted T.;Landstrom E.;Leirimaa S.;Ohman H.;Pitkala K.;Punkka A.;Saavalainen A. -M.;Salo T.;Sepa M.;Sohlberg K.;Urtamo A.;Vaatamoinen E.;Venalainen S.;Vanhanen H.;Vellas B.;Van Kan G. A.;Biville V.;Brigitte L.;Cervera C.;Cesari M.;Champarnaud M.;Cluzan C.;Croizet M.;Dardenne S.;Dorard M.;Dupuy C.;Durand E.;Faisant C.;Fougere B.;Girard P.;Guyonnet S.;Hoogendijk E.;Mauroux R.;Milhet A.;Montel S.;Ousset P. -J.;Picauron C.;Soriano G.;Teguo M. T.;Teysseyre B.;Andrieu S.;Blasimme A.;Dray C.;Rial-Sebbag E.;Valet P.;Dantoine T.;Billot M.;Cardinaud N.;Castelli M.;Charenton-Blavignac M.;Ciccolari-Micaldi C.;Gayot C.;Larreur A.;Laubarie-Mouriet C.;Marchesseau D.;Mergans T.;Nguyen T. B.;Papon A.;Ribet J.;Saulinier I.;Tchalla A.;Rapp T.;Sirven N.;Skalska A.;Blaszcyk E.;Cwynar M.;Czesak J.;Fatyga P.;Fedyk-Lukasik M.;Grodzicki T.;Jamrozik P.;Janusz Z.;Klimek E.;Komoniewska S.;Kret M.;Ozog M.;Parnicka A.;Petitjean K.;Pietrzyk A.;Piotrowicz K.;Skalska-Dulinska B.;Starzyk D.;Szczerbinska K.;Witkiewicz B.;Wlodarczyk A.;Sinclair A.;Harris S.;Ogborne A.;Ritchie S.;Sinclair C.;Sinclair H.;Bellary S.;Harris S.;Worthington H.;Derejczyk J.;Roller-Wirnsberger R.;Jonsson P.;Bordes P.;Arnaud S.;Asbrand C.;Bejuit R.;Durand S.;Flechsenhar K.;Joly F.;Lain R. L.;Moncharmont M.;Msihid J.;Ndja A.;Riche B.;Weber A. C.;Yuan J.;Roubenoff R.;Kortebein P.;Miller R. R.;Gorostiaga C.;Belissa-Mathiot P.;Hu H.;Laigle L.;Melchor I. M.;Russel A.;Bennecky M.;Haws T.;Joshi A.;Philpott K.;Walker A.;Zia G.;Giorgi S. D.;Feletti L.;Marchioro E.;Mocci F.;Varesio M. G.;Cesario A.;Cabin B.;de Boer W. P.;Ignaszewski C.;Klingmann I.;Vollenbroek-Hutten M.;Hermens T.;Jansen-Kosterink S.;Tabak M.;Blandin P.;Coutard L.;Lenzotti A. -M.;Mokhtari H.;Rodon N.
2021
Abstract
Background: The “Sarcopenia and Physical Frailty in Older People: Multicomponent Treatment Strategies” (SPRINTT) project sponsored a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the objective to determine the effect of physical activity and nutrition intervention for prevention of mobility disability in community-dwelling frail older Europeans. We describe here the design and feasibility of the SPRINTT nutrition intervention, including techniques used by nutrition interventionists to identify those at risk of malnutrition and to carry out the nutrition intervention. Methods: SPRINTT RCT recruited older adults (≥ 70 years) from 11 European countries. Eligible participants (n = 1517) had functional limitations measured with Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB score 3–9) and low muscle mass as determined by DXA scans, but were able to walk 400 m without assistance within 15 min. Participants were followed up for up to 3 years. The nutrition intervention was carried out mainly by individual nutrition counseling. Nutrition goals included achieving a daily protein intake of 1.0–1.2 g/kg body weight, energy intake of 25–30 kcal/kg of body weight/day, and serum vitamin D concentration ≥ 75 mmol/L. Survey on the method strategies and feasibility of the nutrition intervention was sent to all nutrition interventionists of the 16 SPRINTT study sites. Results: Nutrition interventionists from all study sites responded to the survey. All responders found that the SPRINTT nutrition intervention was feasible for the target population, and it was well received by the majority. The identification of participants at nutritional risk was accomplished by combining information from interviews, questionnaires, clinical and laboratory data. Although the nutrition intervention was mainly carried out using individual nutritional counselling, other assisting methods were used as appropriate. Conclusion: The SPRINTT nutrition intervention was feasible and able to adapt flexibly to varying needs of this heterogeneous population. The procedures adopted to identify older adults at risk of malnutrition and to design the appropriate intervention may serve as a model to deliver nutrition intervention for community-dwelling older people with mobility limitations.
Jyvakorpi S.K., Ramel A., Strandberg T.E., Piotrowicz K., Blaszczyk-Bebenek E., Urtamo A., et al. (2021). The sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people: multi-component treatment strategies (SPRINTT) project: description and feasibility of a nutrition intervention in community-dwelling older Europeans. EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 12(2), 303-312 [10.1007/s41999-020-00438-4].
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/845064
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
7
30
27
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.
