The NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign seeks to establish whether life on Mars existed where and when environmental conditions allowed. Laboratory measurements on the returned samples are useful if what is measured is evidence of phenomena on Mars rather than of the effects of sterilization conditions. This report establishes that there are categories of measurements that can be fruitful despite sample sterilization and other categories that cannot. Sterilization kills living microorganisms and inactivates complex biological structures by breaking chemical bonds. Sterilization has similar effects on chemical bonds in non-biological compounds, including abiotic or pre-biotic reduced carbon compounds, hydrous minerals, and hydrous amorphous solids. We considered the sterilization effects of applying dry heat under two specific temperature-time regimes and the effects of γ-irradiation. Many measurements of volatile-rich materials are sterilization sensitive—they will be compromised by either dehydration or radiolysis upon sterilization. Dry-heat sterilization and γ-irradiation differ somewhat in their effects but affect the same chemical elements. Sterilization-sensitive measurements include the abundances and oxidation-reduction (redox) states of redox-sensitive elements, and isotope abundances and ratios of most of them. All organic molecules, and most minerals and naturally occurring amorphous materials that formed under habitable conditions, contain at least one redox-sensitive element. Thus, sterilization-sensitive evidence about ancient life on Mars and its relationship to its ancient environment will be severely compromised if the samples collected by Mars 2020 rover Perseverance cannot be analyzed in an unsterilized condition. To ensure that sterilization-sensitive measurements can be made even on samples deemed unsafe for unsterilized release from containment, contingency instruments in addition to those required for curation, time-sensitive science, and the Sample Safety Assessment Protocol would need to be added to the Sample Receiving Facility (SRF). Targeted investigations using analogs of MSR Campaign-relevant returned-sample types should be undertaken to fill knowledge gaps about sterilization effects on scientific measurements, especially if the sterilization regimens eventually chosen are different from those considered in this report. important

Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR) / Velbel M.A., Beaty D.W., CarrierB.L., Cockell C.S., Glavin D.P., Marty B., Regberg A.B., Smith A.l., Tosca N.J., Wadhwa M., Kminek G., Meyer M.A., Haltigin T., Hays L.E., Agee C.B., Busemann H., Cavalazzi B., Debaille V., Grady M.M., Hauber E., Hutzler A., McCubbin F.M., Pratt L.M., Smith C.L., Summons R.E., Swindle T.D., Tait K.T., Udry A., Usui T., Westall F., Zorzano M.-P.. - In: ASTROBIOLOGY. - ISSN 1531-1074. - STAMPA. - 22:S1(2022), pp. S-112-S-164. [10.1089/ast.2021.0113]

Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR)

Cavalazzi B.;
2022

Abstract

The NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign seeks to establish whether life on Mars existed where and when environmental conditions allowed. Laboratory measurements on the returned samples are useful if what is measured is evidence of phenomena on Mars rather than of the effects of sterilization conditions. This report establishes that there are categories of measurements that can be fruitful despite sample sterilization and other categories that cannot. Sterilization kills living microorganisms and inactivates complex biological structures by breaking chemical bonds. Sterilization has similar effects on chemical bonds in non-biological compounds, including abiotic or pre-biotic reduced carbon compounds, hydrous minerals, and hydrous amorphous solids. We considered the sterilization effects of applying dry heat under two specific temperature-time regimes and the effects of γ-irradiation. Many measurements of volatile-rich materials are sterilization sensitive—they will be compromised by either dehydration or radiolysis upon sterilization. Dry-heat sterilization and γ-irradiation differ somewhat in their effects but affect the same chemical elements. Sterilization-sensitive measurements include the abundances and oxidation-reduction (redox) states of redox-sensitive elements, and isotope abundances and ratios of most of them. All organic molecules, and most minerals and naturally occurring amorphous materials that formed under habitable conditions, contain at least one redox-sensitive element. Thus, sterilization-sensitive evidence about ancient life on Mars and its relationship to its ancient environment will be severely compromised if the samples collected by Mars 2020 rover Perseverance cannot be analyzed in an unsterilized condition. To ensure that sterilization-sensitive measurements can be made even on samples deemed unsafe for unsterilized release from containment, contingency instruments in addition to those required for curation, time-sensitive science, and the Sample Safety Assessment Protocol would need to be added to the Sample Receiving Facility (SRF). Targeted investigations using analogs of MSR Campaign-relevant returned-sample types should be undertaken to fill knowledge gaps about sterilization effects on scientific measurements, especially if the sterilization regimens eventually chosen are different from those considered in this report. important
2022
Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR) / Velbel M.A., Beaty D.W., CarrierB.L., Cockell C.S., Glavin D.P., Marty B., Regberg A.B., Smith A.l., Tosca N.J., Wadhwa M., Kminek G., Meyer M.A., Haltigin T., Hays L.E., Agee C.B., Busemann H., Cavalazzi B., Debaille V., Grady M.M., Hauber E., Hutzler A., McCubbin F.M., Pratt L.M., Smith C.L., Summons R.E., Swindle T.D., Tait K.T., Udry A., Usui T., Westall F., Zorzano M.-P.. - In: ASTROBIOLOGY. - ISSN 1531-1074. - STAMPA. - 22:S1(2022), pp. S-112-S-164. [10.1089/ast.2021.0113]
Velbel M.A., Beaty D.W., CarrierB.L., Cockell C.S., Glavin D.P., Marty B., Regberg A.B., Smith A.l., Tosca N.J., Wadhwa M., Kminek G., Meyer M.A., Haltigin T., Hays L.E., Agee C.B., Busemann H., Cavalazzi B., Debaille V., Grady M.M., Hauber E., Hutzler A., McCubbin F.M., Pratt L.M., Smith C.L., Summons R.E., Swindle T.D., Tait K.T., Udry A., Usui T., Westall F., Zorzano M.-P.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ast.2021.0113.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/842563
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact