In a context of highly fragmented woodlands’ ownership, joint forest management implies a reduction of transaction costs for its members and improves the coherence of forestry actions at the landscape scale. Increasing the size of the management unit improves market positioning, permits a more technical management, and improves environmental sustainability in aspects that require spatial coordination. A review of relevant literature on forest owners’ groupings and the lessons learned from case studies in Navarra (Spain) have been analysed from a social capital perspective. Twelve challenges are identified, for which technical recommendations are offered. We navigate through decision-making procedures, geographical cohesion, legitimacy and trust building, transparency and internal communication, trade-offs in efficiency and equity, local idiosyncrasy, management committee dynamics, risk aversion vs. flexibility, legal aspects, joint motivations and long-term vision, and intermediary's efficiency. Existing policy tools help in overcoming some of the economic and technical aspects. However, internal governance challenges require a concerted effort from participating forest owners.
Gorriz-Mifsud E., Olza Donazar L., Montero Eseverri E., Marini Govigli V. (2019). The challenges of coordinating forest owners for joint management. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 99(February 2019), 100-109 [10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.005].
The challenges of coordinating forest owners for joint management
Marini Govigli V.Ultimo
Investigation
2019
Abstract
In a context of highly fragmented woodlands’ ownership, joint forest management implies a reduction of transaction costs for its members and improves the coherence of forestry actions at the landscape scale. Increasing the size of the management unit improves market positioning, permits a more technical management, and improves environmental sustainability in aspects that require spatial coordination. A review of relevant literature on forest owners’ groupings and the lessons learned from case studies in Navarra (Spain) have been analysed from a social capital perspective. Twelve challenges are identified, for which technical recommendations are offered. We navigate through decision-making procedures, geographical cohesion, legitimacy and trust building, transparency and internal communication, trade-offs in efficiency and equity, local idiosyncrasy, management committee dynamics, risk aversion vs. flexibility, legal aspects, joint motivations and long-term vision, and intermediary's efficiency. Existing policy tools help in overcoming some of the economic and technical aspects. However, internal governance challenges require a concerted effort from participating forest owners.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Gorriz-Mifsud et al, 2017.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione
671.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
671.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.