In order to properly model norm change in the law, temporal aspects of legal dynamics must be considered. Since there exist several time-based features of law that should be studied, we discuss two interesting approaches: one based on defeasible logic and the other based on belief revision. Each of these makes use of one of the two classic forms of reasoning about time: point-based and interval-based. Both formalisms provide the necessary logical infrastructure to address the characterization of complex behaviour of legal dynamics.

L.H. Tamargo, D.M. (2021). Time, Defeasible Logic and Belief Revision: Pathways to Legal Dynamics. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS, 8(4), 993-1022.

Time, Defeasible Logic and Belief Revision: Pathways to Legal Dynamics

A. Rotolo
;
2021

Abstract

In order to properly model norm change in the law, temporal aspects of legal dynamics must be considered. Since there exist several time-based features of law that should be studied, we discuss two interesting approaches: one based on defeasible logic and the other based on belief revision. Each of these makes use of one of the two classic forms of reasoning about time: point-based and interval-based. Both formalisms provide the necessary logical infrastructure to address the characterization of complex behaviour of legal dynamics.
2021
L.H. Tamargo, D.M. (2021). Time, Defeasible Logic and Belief Revision: Pathways to Legal Dynamics. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS, 8(4), 993-1022.
L.H. Tamargo, D.C. Martínez, A. Rotolo, G. Governatori
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JAL_2021-92-121.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 1.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/841697
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact