This article analyzes from a critical and comparative perspective the elabo-ration and application of the replacement doctrine by the Colombian Cons-titutional Court, starting from its precedents and inserting it in the context of constitutional adjudication on constitutional amendments. It focuses on its basis and the evolution of its use, emphasizing sensitive cases, in order to place the Colombian case in a comparative framework, investigating to what extent it shall become a benchmark.
RAGONE, S. (2021). La contribución de la jurisprudencia colombiana al debate comparado sobre el poder de reforma: la “sustitución” como paradigma formal y material. REVISTA DERECHO DEL ESTADO, 50, 99-131 [10.18601/01229893.n50.05].
La contribución de la jurisprudencia colombiana al debate comparado sobre el poder de reforma: la “sustitución” como paradigma formal y material
RAGONE, SABRINA
2021
Abstract
This article analyzes from a critical and comparative perspective the elabo-ration and application of the replacement doctrine by the Colombian Cons-titutional Court, starting from its precedents and inserting it in the context of constitutional adjudication on constitutional amendments. It focuses on its basis and the evolution of its use, emphasizing sensitive cases, in order to place the Colombian case in a comparative framework, investigating to what extent it shall become a benchmark.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
La contribución de la jurisprudencia colombiana al debate comparadosobre el poder de reforma: la “sustitución” como paradigma formal y material.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYNCSA)
Dimensione
337.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
337.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.