This article analyzes from a critical and comparative perspective the elabo-ration and application of the replacement doctrine by the Colombian Cons-titutional Court, starting from its precedents and inserting it in the context of constitutional adjudication on constitutional amendments. It focuses on its basis and the evolution of its use, emphasizing sensitive cases, in order to place the Colombian case in a comparative framework, investigating to what extent it shall become a benchmark.

La contribución de la jurisprudencia colombiana al debate comparado sobre el poder de reforma: la “sustitución” como paradigma formal y material

RAGONE, SABRINA
2021

Abstract

This article analyzes from a critical and comparative perspective the elabo-ration and application of the replacement doctrine by the Colombian Cons-titutional Court, starting from its precedents and inserting it in the context of constitutional adjudication on constitutional amendments. It focuses on its basis and the evolution of its use, emphasizing sensitive cases, in order to place the Colombian case in a comparative framework, investigating to what extent it shall become a benchmark.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_DerechoDelEstado.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 337.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
337.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/830775
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact