In spite of a great relevance of the Common EU Asylum System (CEAS) for the whole, still ongoing, EU migration crisis, few academic research focuses on the CEAS implementation at national level and/or in comparative perspective. This explorative study aims to fill this exact gap offering, through a crucial case study perspective, up-to-date data on the CEAS implementation in Italy. The focus of the article is on the judicial stage through which asylum seekers appellate the rejection decisions taken (in first instance) by the governmental administrative bodies at territorial level. In fact, the Italian asylum procedure has been modified in 2017 setting up specialized sections, within the Italian lower courts, dealing with migration issues. Such specialized sections have gradually become crucial institutions in implementing the CEAS in Italy. Here, adopting the Street Level Bureaucracy (SLB) perspective, the study aims to disentangle the margin and the use of discretion (coping mechanisms, strategies and perception of their job) adopted by Italian judges dealing with international protection. The paper aims also to show the added value of adopting such an original perspective, discussing the potential implications of judges behavioural discretion in terms of policy goals and potential impact on asylum seeker rights.
Cristina Dallara, Alice Lacchei (2021). Street-level bureaucrats and coping mechanisms. The unexpected role of Italian judges in Asylum policy implementation. SOUTH EUROPEAN SOCIETY & POLITICS, 26(1), 83-108 [10.1080/13608746.2021.1956161].
Street-level bureaucrats and coping mechanisms. The unexpected role of Italian judges in Asylum policy implementation
Cristina Dallara
Primo
Conceptualization
;Alice LaccheiSecondo
Investigation
2021
Abstract
In spite of a great relevance of the Common EU Asylum System (CEAS) for the whole, still ongoing, EU migration crisis, few academic research focuses on the CEAS implementation at national level and/or in comparative perspective. This explorative study aims to fill this exact gap offering, through a crucial case study perspective, up-to-date data on the CEAS implementation in Italy. The focus of the article is on the judicial stage through which asylum seekers appellate the rejection decisions taken (in first instance) by the governmental administrative bodies at territorial level. In fact, the Italian asylum procedure has been modified in 2017 setting up specialized sections, within the Italian lower courts, dealing with migration issues. Such specialized sections have gradually become crucial institutions in implementing the CEAS in Italy. Here, adopting the Street Level Bureaucracy (SLB) perspective, the study aims to disentangle the margin and the use of discretion (coping mechanisms, strategies and perception of their job) adopted by Italian judges dealing with international protection. The paper aims also to show the added value of adopting such an original perspective, discussing the potential implications of judges behavioural discretion in terms of policy goals and potential impact on asylum seeker rights.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Street level bureaucrats and coping mechanism.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo:
Postprint
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
362.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
362.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.