This article analyses French Parliamentary Discourse about the concept of “Gender Group” as precondition of “Women Group” occurrence during the revision of the French Constitution in 1999. Semantics event (Raus, 2013) concerning “Gender Group” is realized in EU Discourse in the 1990s, but it does not in French Constitu- tional Debate. So, “Women” are reclassifying as a “Group” only in the EU Discourse. The members of French Parliament adapt European rhetoric to the national rhetoric and that is why we suggest to define this as a particular case of discourse colinguism.
Raus R. (2014). La notion « groupe de sexe » dans le débat parlementaire sur la révision de la Constitution française en 1999. ANALELE UNIVERSITATII DIN CRAIOVA SERIA STIINŢE FILOLOGICE LIMBI STRAINE APLICATE, 1/2013(IX), 313-324.
La notion « groupe de sexe » dans le débat parlementaire sur la révision de la Constitution française en 1999
Raus R.
2014
Abstract
This article analyses French Parliamentary Discourse about the concept of “Gender Group” as precondition of “Women Group” occurrence during the revision of the French Constitution in 1999. Semantics event (Raus, 2013) concerning “Gender Group” is realized in EU Discourse in the 1990s, but it does not in French Constitu- tional Debate. So, “Women” are reclassifying as a “Group” only in the EU Discourse. The members of French Parliament adapt European rhetoric to the national rhetoric and that is why we suggest to define this as a particular case of discourse colinguism.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.