Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, ab-dominal, and pedal pump. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g. pain, physical function) and objective (e.g. pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five the pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. Risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and quality of the evidence from very very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompages seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although Despite several studies have been published on manual pump tech-niques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness.
Vanti, C., Golfari, M., Pellegrini, G., Panizzolo, A., Turone, L., Giagio, S., et al. (2021). The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review. APPLIED SCIENCES, 11(9), 4150-4180 [10.3390/app11094150].
The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review
Vanti, CarlaPrimo
;Giagio, Silvia;Pillastrini, Paolo
Ultimo
2021
Abstract
Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, ab-dominal, and pedal pump. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g. pain, physical function) and objective (e.g. pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five the pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. Risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and quality of the evidence from very very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompages seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although Despite several studies have been published on manual pump tech-niques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
applsci-11-04150-s001.zip
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
106.07 kB
Formato
Zip File
|
106.07 kB | Zip File | Visualizza/Apri |
applsci-11-04150-v3_compressed.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
1.4 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.